Comments for AirgunWeb.com

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by sergent

sergent — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:56:03 +0000

Well ive been shooting mine quite a bit now for the last month and am still very happy with the xl. I love the power and its quite a bit quieter than my beeman. The recoil is kind of crazy it seems but I guess thats to be expected from a gun like this. I missed the turkey season unfortunately , but I can still go after crows and what not for now.

Comment on Take AIM Episode 8 – How to rebuild your breakbarrel airgun by blaqheart

blaqheart — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:37:57 +0000

thanks rick for the rundown on servicing a break barrel rifle.my friends and i are loyal followers of your reviews, i am from trinidad (caribbean island) and air gun shops and gunsmiths are scarce so when our guns need servacing it stays at the shop for about 3 months and if they require parts that are out of stock thats 6 months.i am a instrument tec so being machanically inclined istarted to work on my own air rifle and my friend’s as well. we use your reviews as a guide line to purchase quality products and parts,which my dad who lives in atlanta purchases from pymarid air and ships to me.thanks for the time u spend to ensure we the consumers have the information required before making a purchase

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by PaperPunch1

PaperPunch1 — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:06:33 +0000

Well, I have been working on this “distance shooting” (84 yds) and haven’t been able to hit any starlings, but did hit the branch they sit on. It has come to the fact that the ballistics program results are accurate for a scope which has a different reticle than I have currently on my rifle. It does have some choices (on a drop down menu) but none are spaced exactly like mine are, because I don’t get results on a linear level the whole way through the arc of trajectory. By this I mean that at ten and 41 yards the gun is zeroed the same as the program predicts, but where it gives a certain dot “holdover” the point of impact is way off. This can be corrected by purchasing a HAWKE brand scope, which looks like an attractive solution, but right now I am saving up for a marauder so it is out of the question!
If anyone has some experience with the same program, lets hear from you about your shooting results!
Good shooting…………Paul

Comment on Gamo’s New pellets fall short on accuracy. by PaperPunch1

PaperPunch1 — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:55:23 +0000

My Benjamin Trail NP doesn’t like the new gamo pellets either, and they don’t seem to be very consistant in their manufacture either. I am NOT impressed!

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by mike12703

mike12703 — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:53:08 +0000

50 yards will definatly NOT be a streth for the RWS. A friend of mine has a benjamin sheridan pump 20 cal. and shot a squirell square in the shjoulder at 55 yards it only goes 675 fps. If your a good shot 50 yards is nothing

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by Mejores rifles

Mejores rifles — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:41:07 +0000

[...] Pues si es para eso del penta ay un rifle bien bara y preciso dentro de su precio y su distancia de tiro te dejo el link ojala te sirva Daisy [...]

Comment on Daisy Powerline 1000sb Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x32 Scope by angf117

angf117 — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:06:45 +0000

my daughter knocked my model 1000 on the floor and it broke the rear sight off…i reglued it back on,and need to know how to reset the micrometer sight for zero…any help appreciated.

Comment on Gamo’s new CFR Whisper Combo by robsim32

robsim32 — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:18:08 +0000

Hello in youre video you are talking about a change in speed with the CFR. You were talking to Gamo about it did they already answered youre questions. I Have one my self i realy like it. I chanced my trigger into a Charlie da Tuna GRT-4 and now it is realy perfect.

Thanks for youre super explaination of this Gamo

Comment on Beeman R9 .177 w/ Leapers 4-16×50 AO, MD, IR Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:48:16 +0000

Thanks for the information on your R9. My .177 is a dream to shoot. While I prefer my PCP guns, the R9 and the TX200 will remain in my Spring Gun stable because of their workmanship and quality. I believe the rest will go up for auction..

Cheers!

Rick

Comment on Gamo’s New pellets fall short on accuracy. by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:46:15 +0000

Just a note.. and I just found out.. the new Winchester pellets are the SAME pellet as the old Gamo pellets.. I’m waiting on a response from Gamo about how someone else has their pellets.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:45:04 +0000

Hey there Paul,

Good work on the gun. The Trigger really makes a huge difference for sure. Let us know how things go with the distance shooting.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by PaperPunch1

PaperPunch1 — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:04:51 +0000

Hey there web folks……I bought the standard NP this fall, and after getting the right pellets for it it, and replacing that “god awfull trigger” to a GTX gen2 it shoots very well.
It likes the H&N FTT 14.66 gr. domed pellet, and shoots them at an average of 730.5 FPS with a very small velocity spread…..I threw my results paper away a few weeks ago, but take my word for it…it was very consistant in velocity. I DID HOWEVER
run a few dry patches through it after about 50 shots, and had to re-zero, but it’s been real good at 20 yards ever since. I can get ten shots under a quarter without any trouble. (off shooting sticks at 20 yds.)
I have the free “chairgun” software downloaded and will be setting it up to shoot further this weekend. I want to see if I can reliably reach a certain tree out back, where the starlings feel safe….he he he
The tree in question is 84 yds. from my bench………go ahead ‘n laugh if you want, but I really do feel it IS within reason, providing I can match what the program parameters are…..I printed off the chart and it says if I zero at 41yds. I can hit 80 yds with a 4 mil-dot hold over.
Any others tinker with this long distance shooting with their NP’s???
Thanks for read’n………………………….Paul

Comment on Gamo’s New pellets fall short on accuracy. by blaqheart

blaqheart — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:44:30 +0000

i am also disappointed with gamo’s new hunter pillet.Personally i have opted to use h&n baracuda.

Comment on Beeman R9 .177 w/ Leapers 4-16×50 AO, MD, IR Scope by ibramson

ibramson — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:51:40 +0000

I too have a Beeman R9. Mine is in 20 caliber and I use it to control the local chipmunk population which is getting out of control on my property. The 20 caliber is a bit slower than the 177 due to pellet weight, but seems to pack a decent wallop when it reaches the target. I do not consider myself a good shot, but I do pretty well with this rifle. I have been taking out varmints at 20 to 30 yards. Once the scope is sighted in, I pretty much hit what I am aiming at. I did have to get used to the hold sensitivity of this rifle and once I figured out just how to hold it, things got much better.

I am not a big person and find that this rifle with a decent scope a bit heavy. But if I can steady it for 3-4 seconds, the varmint in my sights is toast. I agree 100% about the fit and finish. I have had two broken springs (replaced by Air Venturi) in the first year of ownership. One of their gunsmiths told me that the German springs are “too hard” and have the tendency to break. They outfitted my rifle with an American made spring supplied by a local supplier. It seems smoother and I notice no drop in velocity.

If I were to buy another rifle, it would be another R9 in 22 caliber for larger varmints. I give this rifle 5 starts out of 5.

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:07:22 +0000

[...] arreglo la mira que trae el kit del airmaster 77 para que enfocara bien a 35 metros(esta en ingles Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle | airgunweb.com ) dejo el fragmento del comentario traducido para ver si te puede servir. Este perrito litlle (el [...]

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by cygnus x

cygnus x — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:57:47 +0000

I got the Benjamin Regal….a mix between the crosman trail and benji trail….anyhow i dont believe theres a two stage trigger…but after removing spring from the triggergroup that only served to make the pull harder…once removed the trigger adjustment screw worked like supposed.

its a .177, and im shooting 60-70 feet, and can shoot quarter sized groups with mine….it took some experimenting on how to hold, and which pellet it liked

mine likes CPH’s(cardboard boxed ones), JSB and crowmagnums (go figure)

JSB are the best by quite a margin, but only available online, so i started to shoot crosman premier heavy (CPH) which i had 4 boxes of and groups opened up a bit, but not much

i also have about 1500 crowmagnums i required in a trade, and surpricingly they shoot about 1″ higher but are every bit as accurate at 50-60 feet as the CPH, which was a real surprice, as i have never had a gun that would shoot them in this caliber or .22 well…..my Crapid in .25 shoots them real well too which is a bit weird i know but crows at 50-75 yards is not problem with the .25 crowmagnums

anyhow back to the benji regal….i love it, cocking it it smooth, shooting cycle is smooth, ten times better than my tuned B30 which is only shooting 12 fpe, vs the benji’s 18 fpe….i havent chroniet it so i cant confirm the 18 fpe, but the pellet zips right through a squirrels head, and my gamo pellet trap is getting mighty dented even though its at 60feet at least, by 12 fpe b30 does not dent it at all

my only regret is that i wish i had gotten the low power crosman trail NP instead, i dont need the power this rifle puts out, i got other rifles for that job (aa410.22, crapid.25, talon ss .177-.22.25.9mm)

is it possible to lower the pressure of the gasram….i know my eliminator had a little valve to let out a bit of pressure, and so did the rx1, im not really in the mood to take the benji appart to just take a look

ohh the 4×32 scope included with the regal, is ok, the mounts are garbage….get a good onepiece mount, and i suggest getting a better scope as well, im using my very cheap BAM 4-12×40 scope and one piece mount, it made a huge difference in accuracy..i repeat HUGE !!! also tighten screws and give them a drop of blue locktite to glue them in place….if you dont have blue locktite just use any crazy glue, it usually wont stick so much you cant get it apart, and if it does take a soldering iron and heat the screw a bit and it should come right out

im very happy with my benjamin regal, i wonder if they sell a .22 barrel, because at 18 fpe it would be doable with light .22 pellets, maybe even gain a few fpe

imho springers should not be overpowered 20 fpe at max….to keep them controlable, there are some hotter rifles out there like the theoben eliminator/beeman crowmagnum which are awersome in .22 at 25-30 fpe ! but also 10 times the price, for the 154$ i paid for the regal im very happy with it

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:18:49 +0000

Hey there.. the big differences are size and power.. The added power equates to a much more difficult rifle to shoot and also reduces accuracy. You are better off with the standard Trail NP over the NP XL

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by glenzo408

glenzo408 — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:20:42 +0000

Ive recently order the .22 cal Benjamin np. Does anyone know the difference between the regular np and the np xl 1100? I’m assuming crosman claims the xl shoots 1100 fps. I guess my question would be can the regular np be modified or would it be cheaper just to buy the xl?

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:54:08 +0000

I started evaluating the .25 and I could not complete the review. The rifle had too many problems. It was terribly underpowered and the accuracy was around 8″ at 10 yards. So I packed it up and sent it back. From my experience the .25 cal is too much for spring guns. Great in a PCP gun.. not great in spring. .22 is a much better caliber.

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by sergent

sergent — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:37:56 +0000

Do you have any plans to do any testing on the .25 ? I was going back and forth deciding which to buy between .22 and .25.
Thanks
Mike

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:34:50 +0000

I’m really glad that you are having such success with your Trail. I have had similar experiences with mine. Great power and accuracy. Unfortunately, the quality control issues mean that you and I get a good one and someone else may get a dud. I had a dud come in when I purchased my all weather version. It had a defective barrel joint. I sent it back and the replacement’s been fine.

Cheers!

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by sergent

sergent — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:07:36 +0000

I just purchased one of these rifles and I love it! Yes the trigger sucks and they made it in China for some reason , but what power! Its obvious to me that the factory used to build these had to meet fairly strict standards. It is built very well compared to other chinese guns. I am sure there will be a few bad one out there as there are with any makers guns. I had mine zeroed in within 20 pellets out of the box and took down a crow at 60 yard plus! I think some of the accuracy complaints about this gun are just people who dont know how to set up the scope properly. So many newbies think you just mount it and go. I am also going to purchase the RWS 350. I will give them a long term comparison. Im sure the Rws will out last in the long run , but we will see. I do recommend this gun. At least in the .22. Thanks for reading, mike.

Comment on Gamo CFX Tactical by redone1992

redone1992 — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 01:03:49 +0000

Hi the name here is don I just got a gamo varmit hunter.
What a sweet air gun after a few mod,s first thing i did was take the trigger apart
and debur it a big improvement.
Next a Leapers 4-16×40 ao md ir scope and weaver adapter.
Now i see why you like them so much.
I got the Gamo at Dick,s sporting good, for $150.00 a good deal i think for a local store to have in stock to look and hold before buying.
All the rest a got at pa wow what fast shiping they have i orded over a 100.00 to get free shiping orderd on sat and got it tuesday.

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:31:34 +0000

Hey there. 50 yards will be a stretch for the 34, but not impossible.. you will want to get it in .22 for sure and not .177.. As for a scope, I really like the Leapers 3-12×40 ao, md, ir scope.. very cool, very nice.. great price. use the leapers heavy duty accushot 1 piece mount for the scope.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:12:18 +0000

When i say long distances i refer maybe to 50 yarfs or something like that… So RWS 34… Yep i can expend that but the problem is the scope i think ill be buying first the rile only hope this RWS dont dissapoint me but hey u are the experts jejeje thabks for the advice and maybe you can recommend a scope also…
Thanks

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:29:17 +0000

When you say “long distances” what do you have in mind? The Vantage is a great rifle. Yes it needs a new trigger and yes it needs a new scope.. but these issues would exist with just about any gun you buy in this range. If you want to spend a little more money, get the RWS 34 in .22. Get it without a scope and add a scope later. It is German made and has an excellent trigger.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by Daniel

Daniel — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:49:41 +0000

Hey… I may sound kind of stupid but im a totally beginner and im on my way on buying my first air rifle and im considering the advantage… Ive read alot about this rifle and all reviews ponit out the same problems: scope and trigger… So im starting to cknsider other rifles cuz i love shooting very long distances so if th scope will fall apart that soon then what u recommend? I really need help since im a beginner and dont have more than 200 dlls… Ill be pleased if someone reply and help me… Thanks

Comment on RWS DBL Lockdown Mount Issue by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:40:38 +0000

I’m glad this was a help to you. I’ve dropped the RWS mount and moved to the Leapers 1 piece heavy duty accushot mount. That has solved my issues so far. The 34, with a little initial TLC has turned into one very nice shooter.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on RWS DBL Lockdown Mount Issue by irishsailormn

irishsailormn — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:09:15 +0000

Rick;
Great work with this review and all of your reviews. I purchased a new RWS 34 with this new mount and Lepers scope and could not figure out why my shots were inconsistent. Once I saw this review I looked and I had exactly the same problem.

Thanks

John

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:36:05 +0000

Frank,

The trigger that I endorse is the GTX Gen-II trigger. While there are those that would argue that it is inferior to the GRT – III trigger. I would disagree. I have both triggers and I prefer the GTX GEN-II trigger. You can get it from Airguns of Arizona for about $30. Now, from what I hear, the XL version has some issues with replacement triggers. You need to know what you are doing in order to have a successful install. I’m considering offering this service, along with some basic repairs, tunes, and lubes of some airguns. I have not decided on it yet, but I’m considering it. If you’d like, give me a call 928-854-4981 and we can chat.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by MRFranksG21

MRFranksG21 — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:13:16 +0000

Thanks Rick for the encouraging words. I’ve read reviews of this rifle, and have noted that some people have swapped out the Benjamin trigger for something else. What that something else is remains a mystery. Do you know of a replacement trigger for the NP?

Thanks,

Frank

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:16:49 +0000

You did well to get the NP over the NP XL.. While the XL shoots faster it is much more difficult to control. When a $200 airgun hits and groups at 50 yards, you keep the gun.. I’ve seen folks spend 3 times that much and not get the same results. Velocity is only effective when you hit your target. Better to be accurate at 730 fps than miss at 900 fps.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:13:07 +0000

Hey there.. Not really.. I’ve not had that issue before. I’d call Crosman’s support line and speak to one of their reps. They are pretty decent over there.

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by leonard

leonard — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:57:00 +0000

I borrowed my daughter’s Crossman 357, not knowing any thing about the gun and not having the manual. I finally figured out how to access the CO2 cartridge and managed to change that. Then I got the gun open to load the pellets but now when I attemt to close the gun, the catch from the metal housing to the plastic barrel does not seem to engage properly. Does any one have any suggestions?

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by MRFranksG21

MRFranksG21 — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:59:54 +0000

Well, the Benjamin Trail NP (not the XL as I thought I had purchased) arrived. Cleaned it, attached the sling, collimated the scope and went to the range. Today I was shooting at 100 yards with my Savage 93r17BTV, so I moved the target to the 50 yard line and commenced to zero the Trail NP in .22. Well, it took a couple of spotters to help me realize I was in the dirt about 5 yards in front of the target. 10 pellets later I as in the black at 50 yards (from my perspective, that is the maximum effective range of the rifle). Then I commenced to shoot out the center of the target at that distance–I was not using a sand bag or any other type of rest. The 2-stage trigger was smooth, albeit quite long, but when it let off it came as a surprise. Cocking effort was moderate, and the rifle balanced well between my hands. When I examined the rifle and the contents of the box I decided to call Pyramyd Air about the velocities of the ten shots they put through the rifle before shipping it. Spoke with one of the techs after the as I was concerned about the 200fps drop in chronographed velocity between the first and tenth shots. They informed me that that was normal during the break in phase, and that once broken in would probably shoot in the low 700s with 14 grain lead pellets. I presume a solid copper pellet would shoot a little faster as the copper would provide more friction through the barrel thereby increasing velocity by a small amount. All in all, I am pleased with the purchase. If I want a little more zip from the Benjamin, I may purchase the Trail NP XL at some later date. For now, I am happy with my purchase– this rifle, I am convinced, will serve me well.

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by MRFranksG21

MRFranksG21 — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:04:07 +0000

I’m awaiting the arrival of my Benjamin Trail NP XL .22 air rifle, and these posts make me apprehensive about the rifle. Although I purchased it from Pyramydair.com and paid for the 10 for $10 option, all of you are making me think I made the wrong choice. Well, I suppose returning it should it fail is an option. I was looking for power in a .22 air rifle, as we can hunt wild turkey here in CA with a .20 or larger caliber air rifle. I’ve read many reviews about this rifle, but you guys are scaring me with your tales of woe.

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 31 May 2011 12:47:19 +0000

That is a sad but often true commentary of Crosman’s quality control. As much as I like my Benjamin Trail NP (fortunately mine doesn’t have the barrel loosening issue) I going to have to stop recommending it I believe. It looks like RWS has a competitor to it that is in the same price range, but has German made quality and quality control. The RWS 34 with the new T06 trigger is really something else. I’ll have a post on it soon. Just a note, I’m going to be sending your comments directly to the head of Crosman’s product development team. He also works with quality control. Whether it will do any good or not has yet to be seen. FYI, I had the same problem with my NPSS. The barrel joint failed. Gamo’s, the new ones anyway, are also having a similar issue because they use composite for the breach block rather than metal. I’ve had better results with Ruger (BAM/Xisico) and some of the Tech Force guns. It is sad that Crosman is making excuses for their poor quality control rather than fixing it.

Hope you get some resolution.

Rick

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 31 May 2011 12:40:21 +0000

I used a Crosman 1 piece mount. Basically the same as the Leapers Accushot 1 piece mount.

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by yroy27

yroy27 — Fri, 27 May 2011 18:57:28 +0000

I bought the trail np synthetic stock .22 cal. According to articles I have read it shoots a 14.8 grain at about 700fps. This is the power I was looking for. I didn’t want something around 1000 fps or I would buy a powder burner with low velocity shells. The gun shot poorly Sent the gun back 2 times I told Crosman not to send me another unless it was tested for accuracy. They did and sent me a target to prove it. I shot the gun and the barrel was very tight when you cocked it. The gun shot pretty close to the target they sent me. After 50-100 rounds the barrel loosened up and so did my groups. Pretty soon I could not hold a 1.5 inch group at 11 yards. I tightened all the screws along with the barrel screw. Nothing helped. I knew it had to be the barrel not ligning up. I bought a 150.00 laser and mount and attached it right to the barrel. I moved the dot to the cross hairs of the scope. Cocked the gun and the laser was no longer aligned with the cross hairs. I sighted the gun in at 13 yards using the laser. Using the laser the gun would shoot a 1 hole group of 5 shots at 13 yards. The scope crosshairs never repeated to the laser dot. I wrote to crosman they said that I was experiencing barrel droop and it happens with break barrel guns. This happened on 3 of there guns with in less than a few hundred rounds. They told me I should rest the barrel on a rest to avoid barrel droop. One of the worst things you can do is put pressure on your barrel to control accuracy.
This gun is about 6 to 7 months old. With the laser as your sight it shoots good. guessing elavation is tough. The scope is only usefull for seeing the dot at long ranges during the day. It never stays aligned with the laser because the barrel lock up never repeats.
I would never pay this much for a gun that shot this poorly.

Comment on Remington Vantage 1200 by TXCAL

TXCAL — Thu, 26 May 2011 22:10:50 +0000

What scope mount did you use?

Comment on Gamo’s New pellets fall short on accuracy. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Thu, 26 May 2011 02:32:14 +0000

did you actually expect anything more from CRAPO? lol

Comment on Airgunweb and Crosman Part Company by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:06 +0000

Thank you so much for your comments and I’m glad that you are loving your Trail NP. They are great guns for sure.

Thanks again.

Rick

Comment on Airgunweb and Crosman Part Company by bigr244

bigr244 — Tue, 24 May 2011 17:58:52 +0000

Rick-

I hope Crossman views my comment because its a perfect example of why Crossman needs AirgunWeb.com.

About 3 months ago I was in the market for my first Air Gun. After weeks of visiting local gun shops and receiving very little help I found airgunweb.com on YouTube.

Not only did you have everything to do with my purchase of the New Crossman Trail NP you offered me answers to my questions via your personal email free of charge!!! This review also prompted both of my hunting partners to purchase the exact same NP as it fit our needs perfectly!

If it wasn’t for Airgunweb.com I would have NEVER even known the Crossman Trail NP existed!!!

The other sponsors will continue to reap the benefits of your extremely detailed reviews of new products. I however will not purchase any additional Crossman products.

Your reviews are without a doubt the most professional and detailed available to a consumer that you can find ANYWHERE!!!

Thanks
R.S
Illinois

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by Powerline 953 Targetmaster para plinkear

Powerline 953 Targetmaster para plinkear — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:17:48 +0000

[...] [...]

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:40:00 +0000

I’m not sure.. you need to check your local laws. If you can, then give PyramydAir a call (www.pyramydair.com).

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by Pankaj

Pankaj — Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:30:16 +0000

Can I purchase from India
reply: pankajkhatale@gmail.com

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:00:13 +0000

I’d shoot out the excess c02 and leave it unloaded..

Rick

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:58:38 +0000

I like both for different reasons… I like the standard one for the open sights and I like the tactical one for the added velocity.. As for buying them, take a look at http://www.pyramydair.com

Cheers

Rick

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by Adam

Adam — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:15:28 +0000

Also is it alright to leave the CO2 in and fully loaded at all times? or should I take them out when im done using the gun?

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by Adam

Adam — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:15:10 +0000

Looks very interesting defiantly something i would try i have 2 questions for ya please, would you recommend the tactical one or the regular one? and where would be a good place to buy it new?

Thanks

Comment on RWS 350 Feuerkraft .22 cal W/ UTG Droop Compensator & 3-9×40 AO, MD, IR Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:35:16 +0000

They shoot about the same. My 350 is still breaking in and smoothing out. I took it up o the range the other day and was doing well at 50 yards. I expect it to get better as time goes by.
Cheers

Rick

Comment on RWS 350 Feuerkraft .22 cal W/ UTG Droop Compensator & 3-9×40 AO, MD, IR Scope by twh731

twh731 — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:41:48 +0000

Another excellent review, Rick. I was wondering if there is a difference between the 350 Magnum and 350 Feuerkraft as far a hold sensitivity. Is one easier to shoot well over the other or are they both the same beast with one just having better open sights than the other? Thanks so much and keep up the great work! Tom

Comment on Benjamin Trail NP XL w/ Centerpoint 3-9×40 AO Scope by CobraKaz

CobraKaz — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:11:31 +0000

I just bought one of these Trail NP XL 1100 . I guess i was expecting alot after reading reviews .
When i opened the box , the site of this rifle left me standing in awe . The size , the look . To me , it looked like something Clint Eastwood would own . Big , Powerfull ,silent , so , with that thought i proceeded to unwrap the gun and install the scope .
Re-reading the literature again .
70 % quieter than a springer , up to 1100 fps with PBA and 900 fps with lead , less recoil than a springer .
Boy was i stoked .
Well ,i get the scope installed , go to break the barrel , wow , this is real easy . Others were commenting on what a ” Bear ” this gun is to cock .
Not this one . First shot . Yikes , less recoil !!!! Gun near took off out my hands !!! Quieter , well not until the first few hundred shots but acceptable . Now , the POWER , where is it ??? I get my old Superstreak , put in a 14.3 g copperehead pellet , aim at 15mm thick wooden plank that i have targets on . At 50′ the Superstreak puts a pellet through it , 2nd pellet breaks the plank . I now try the same test with Nitro Trail with an 18.3g pellet . Bounces off !!! 14.3g pellet barely makes it in . 3rd shot same thing . Thisgun has to be broken in by now . I’ve shot 5 tins of ammo through it . Accuracy , FORGET IT . lucky if you can hit the same target from 50′ 2 outa 5 shots , and thats a 2 liter pepsi jug . I try another experiment with 1 liter pepsi bottle filled with water . Superstreak goes clean through Nitro POS just goes in one side . I just ordered myself a Chrony so i can check . If you buy one of these reifles , i would suggest getting Pyramid Air to give it their $10 test before they send it . Lot of money to pay for something thats really no good . Now , like i said , i may hav got a dud but , for that kinda of money , i think these guns should be checked from the factory and supplied with a sheet of paper documenting the fps .
Sorry for being so negative but its really frustrating for me . I don’t even have a warranty card in the box that i can send off . What do i do if the Chrony shows that this really is
an ” Underachiever “

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:31:26 +0000

Even before PyramydAir became a sponsor, I was buying all my rifles and supplies from them. Their customer support is great and their prices are very competitive. Most orders ship free AND you save on sales tax.

Rick

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by Korak

Korak — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:28:01 +0000

When, at my advanced age, I decided to get an air rifle I looked at the guns at Walmart. I liked the look of the Crosman Phantom. After looking at guns on the web I dedicided to buy mine from Pyramid. For the difference in cost I think it was, for me, a good deal. The actual difference was less than $13. With the Pryamid gun some one had unpacked it, checked it for function and chronoed it. Well worth difference.

Tom

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:48:33 +0000

Hey there,

I buy all my supplies from them. They are a major supporter of this site and my youtube site, but I bought all my stuff from them before all that started. Great bunch of folks.

Rick

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by bigcat1200

bigcat1200 — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:33:35 +0000

Hey, i was wondering if http://www.pyramydair.com was a trusted website too buy the big cat from? Thanks.

Comment on Crosman NightStalker Tactical with Red / Green Dot Scope, Tactical Flashlight, and Bi-Pod by BigD Burbank

BigD Burbank — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:14:35 +0000

Have had mine for month. Love it. I agree with almost all of your review. I have not experienced any of the problems some people have said they had,… Jamming, hard to load and unload clip from rifle,sighting, etc. I zeroed mine in with about 6-8 pellets. I can cover the holes in the target with a quarter. Only one jam. I’m convinced it was the pellet itself because no matter what hole in the clip I put it in, it would be loose. My advice to everyone,READ THE MANUAL, sight it in properly, load the clip properly, oil the tip of every new cylinder, and you will probably have as much fun as I am having. Enjoy the Nightstalker!

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:57:48 +0000

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:57:11 +0000

testing H&N

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:55:47 +0000

testing H&N

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 16 May 2010 13:25:58 +0000

testing the email notification system.. take 2

Admin

Please continue discussion on the forum: link
Reply

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 16 May 2010 13:17:53 +0000

testing the email notification system.. take 1

Admin

Comment on Daisy Powerline 1000sb Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x32 Scope by Oonyx

Oonyx — Thu, 13 May 2010 08:33:41 +0000

Well, I bought the Powerline 1000 3 years ago, and I was really impressed that i almost fired 6000 pellets and it is still hard to cock! The most boring thing about it is that it recoils badly and very light even with scope. After all I like it so much because it allows me to kill at 82 meters and wound at 94 meters!!

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by powermacvt

powermacvt — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:37:24 +0000

Just testing another plugin.. thanks!

Rick

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:22 +0000

nope you’re wrong.. I’m testing again.

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:05 +0000

testing again

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:13:53 +0000

testing again threaded comments

Comment on IZH-61 Side lever .177- VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:13:40 +0000

Testing Threaded Comments…

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by Gerald Austin

Gerald Austin — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:44:59 +0000

I have the PCP version and have been shooting it for a few days now. Love the added power but havent done a side by side on a large number of shots yet.

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by Gerald Austin

Gerald Austin — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:00:11 +0000

Hadn’t realized there were comments on the review.

Just as a follow up I took the gun off the rack after a year or more on the wall, screwed the scope (A daisy 3×9) that had been put on after I did the review. At 25 Yds or so needed 4 clicks to get it back on.

Ordered a PCP version from Compasseco so am looking forward to a side by side on accuracy and velocity.

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:06:23 +0000

You’d be better off going with a Gamo Big Cat over either of them.

Rick

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by chrisva

chrisva — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:25:33 +0000

hey rick,
I am trying to buy an air rifle but I dont know what to choose from crosman storm xt or crosman g1 extreme..
I heard that crosman storm xt is crosman quest 1000x rifle with better scope.
so which one is better in your opinion?
Thanks

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:28:01 +0000

the new model does have much nicer open sights.. I’m still waiting for my review model to come in…

Rick

Comment on Walther .25 Cal Falcon Hunter with Crosman Nitro Piston by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:19:40 +0000

I prefer the .22. The power difference is so minute that I prefer the .22. The pellets are cheaper and the added velocity helps it shoot flatter out past 25 and 35 yards.

Rick

Comment on Walther .25 Cal Falcon Hunter with Crosman Nitro Piston by drzoidberg223

drzoidberg223 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:01:41 +0000

do you prefer .22 cal or .25 cal?

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by drzoidberg223

drzoidberg223 — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:50:39 +0000

i ordered one and it came with fiber optic sights so they must have fixed that issue. great gun

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by ratherbshootin

ratherbshootin — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:44:03 +0000

I know this is an old post for you but I have just seen the video and I own this gun and wanted to comment on the trigger situation. I had the same problems with the trigger that you did but I found one simple fix. If you replace the adjustment screw with a longer one you can take alot of the creep out of the trigger. I went a little further and took it apart and worked on the sear and polished the whole mechanism. It now breaks at about 1 1/2 pounds and is very crisp. I know this voids the warranty but I figured for the price of the gun I was willing to take the chance. The screw replacement is an easy fix for anyone. Just wanted to put my two cents in. Thanks for providing a great forum for us shooting nuts.
Dave

Comment on BAM B26 and Beeman Kodiak Pellets….. wow… by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:49:17 +0000

I don’t think I had really locked on to the silver bears as an option at that point. Because the are so light, they may do well close in at 15 yards and under. I would expect them to open up beyond that.

cheers.

Rick

Comment on BAM B26 and Beeman Kodiak Pellets….. wow… by itsnotom

itsnotom — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:28:28 +0000

what kind of groups did you get with the silver bears at closer ranges? im getting groups almost as good as the kodiaks with hobbys and this is my gun. i guess you didnt check them in your test with this gun

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:18:51 +0000

Glad you liked it. I was shooting about 30 feet away… maybe a little bit more. Not sure about holsters… I need to find a good source for some.

Rick

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by steve

steve — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:55:40 +0000

Rick,

I have enjoyed all your reviews and videos but I found this one particularly interesting. This is something I would like to try myself.

What distance are you from your target? Also, do you have any recommendations for holsters?

Keep up the good work! Thanks,

Steve

Comment on Crosman 66 Powermaster – Surprise of the weekend… by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:18:39 +0000

Thank you for the update!

Rick

Comment on Crosman 66 Powermaster – Surprise of the weekend… by DeepEastKilla

DeepEastKilla — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:37:16 +0000

Hey rick. ITs mxf7010g8k from youtube. just figured id leave a message on here. this gun is very good. ive had it for a LONG time and its still going strong. after a few ,months i got another one but on my second i found the major design flaw. The gun is very accurate and light but after youve had it for a while and you drop it or it gets bumped areound you will have issues keeping zero. the problem is that the barrel and the action are 2 separate parts. its not a huge problem but after a while it starts to get worse and u can even wiggle it back and forth. the barrel is just pressure fitted into the outside metal sleeve. if you do like i did(after it became unusable) u can actually take the entire barrel out by tapping the front sight away from the gun. so the gun is very good but the design flaw will show after hard use over time.

Comment on Walther Falcon Hunter .22 Cal w/ Air Venturi Gas Ram by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:18:44 +0000

I think it is heavier than 27 pound… of course I had the gas ram version too.
Rick

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:05:55 +0000

Well… the GRTIII is a snap.. no worries there.. on the scope.. I’d get a 3-9×32 or 3-9×40 scope. should be all you need.
Rick

Comment on Walther Falcon Hunter .22 Cal w/ Air Venturi Gas Ram by gseely

gseely — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:02:07 +0000

Pyramyd Air’s website lists the cocking effort of this gun at just 27 pounds. That seemed extremely low, which is why I checked here.

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by aarp

aarp — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:28:43 +0000

Hey rick,
I was wondering how hard you think it would be for a beginner to install a GTR III on this baby? Also, if I were to replace the scope, which scope would you recommend to replace it for short-medium range shooting? Thanks,
Sean

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:27:50 +0000

Hello again.. not sure about what would be best.. I don’t have the 1000 anymore and I’ve never shot the 500x.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:25:48 +0000

Hey there.. Not sure about the 500.

cheers.

rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:24:51 +0000

I’m not sure what worked best in the Quest.. I believe I talk about it in the video. I don’t have the gun anymore.

Thanks for your comments.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by sniper15

sniper15 — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:49:39 +0000

hey Rick, if i had a crosman quest 1000x could i use the same pellets i used in the 1000x in a 500x?
Thanks

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by sniper15

sniper15 — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:58:11 +0000

hey,what is the best hunting pellet and for accuracy for the crosman quest 500x.

Thanks

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by sniper15

sniper15 — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:10:37 +0000

Hey Rick, What is the best hunting pellet and for accuracy for the crosman quest 1000x. your vids are great

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:24:40 +0000

The Contender 89 is on par if not a little better shooting than the 34. it is not as powerful as the Falcon or the new NPSS from Crosman. I actually like the NPSS more than the Contender and the Walther at this point. Price is a bit high, but you get a very powerful, gas ram equipped rifle with a well matched scope for around $300. I think the NPSS is easier to handle than the Walther and the 89. I hope to be getting an RWS 34 in the not to distant future.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by R.W.

R.W. — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:34:28 +0000

is this better than a RWS 34? is this better than buying a Walther Talon w/ the gas upgrade for $300? btw, is the stock scope on the Walther Falcon from Pyramyd that much better than the stock scope on the Talon?
you’re the best. Thanks

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:00:12 +0000

You may be able to with good shot placement. You will want to shoot for the vitals, i.e. lungs and heart, not the head. You may want to try some of the predator polymag pellets when you get the chance.. they do serious wound damage.

Rick

Comment on 2300T from Crosman’s Custom Shop! by kevman

kevman — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:00:17 +0000

Hey Erick,
Great article. I am happy to finally see a one on one with the 2300. I purchased one with the 14 inch barrel in .22 and the shoulder stock about 2 years ago. Needless to sayit is the most accurate airgun I own. I recently purchased a 24 inch .177 barrel, replaced the .22 and wow!!! The accuracy was phenomenal. Ten shot groups covered with a dime at my 25 yard range. The really outstanding thing is, the pellet it loves in .177 is the Crosman pointed field pellets. This also happens to be one of the least expensive so the hours of enjoyment just keep piling up.

Thank you again for the good work you do and thanks to Rick also. You guys keep it up.
Sicerely, Kevin Overton

Comment on Gamo Big Cat with 4×32 Scope by drzoidberg223

drzoidberg223 — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:01:55 +0000

really happy with my big cat, used the idea of using where it turns thick to thin on the reticle now im hitting tin cant all the way out to 70+ yards with little effort. anyway what do you think the largest thing i could hunt with it is? i live by a neighbor with a real groundhog problem. he has horses and wants me to try and get rid of the groundhogs for him. i didnt know if the pellets i was using (crosman premier hollowpoints) would take down something that large (max of 12lbs or so)just looking for advice.

Comment on Marauder Meaderings: First Look by Marauder First Look | The Recycle Bin

Marauder First Look | The Recycle Bin — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:55:16 +0000

[...] came across this informative “first look” Marauder article at airgunweb. If you’re reading this review and you’re like me, you’ve already read every other review [...]

Comment on Benjamin Discovery Introduction and Scope Mounting and Adjustment tips – VIDEO by alanrw123

alanrw123 — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0000

Hi Rick, have just finished watching all reviews on the benjamin discovery as well as making a donation to your website. I live in Adelaide South Australia and enjoy your site and reviews. based on research and your great reviews I am about to order a benjamin discovery. Will keep watching for other great reviews.
Alan Walker
Adelaide
South Australia
alanrw@tadaust.org.au

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:39:33 +0000

Well, I’m very glad that I have been some help. I’ve worked very hard and thanks to great companies like PyramydAir, Crosman, and Gamo, we’ve had lots of products to review. Keep us up to date on your progress and let us know when you get your next rifle.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:38 +0000

um… I’d pick the Gamo Big Cat.

Rick

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by DrTorchwood

DrTorchwood — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:05:46 +0000

First I’d like to say what a great site, it has helped us (my 3 boys & I) pick our first air rifle for their use.

Having read a few reviews that were within our price range & going by what I could remember from target shooting in my youth (various countries around the world), we decided to go for the Remmington 77.

I must say that your review was spot on as to the way the rifle operates, the average FPS.
I took an educated guess as far as less pumps (3 to 5 pumps) for my children & managed attaing great accuracy at 25 / 35 & 50 yards using both BB (Crossman copper) & Crossman’s Hunting tip .177 pellets.

We had been looking for something that my 12 yearold could start to use in anticipation of gaining his rifle badges at camp, thus a good ‘training rifle’ & also one that his younger brother aged 10 could perhaps ‘take a turn’ and still remain on target.

This litlle puppy (the Remmington 77) fits the bill 100%.

The chat about the cheap sights gave me some concern, I almost picked up a ‘centerpoint’ along with 2 sizes of traps & targets.

In a way I am glad I didn’t spend extra as I found that when 8 to 10 minutes is spent with the scope it can indeed be operational & clear at distances past 40 yards.

All it takes is screwing back the rear optics to the last few threads & then gradually winding back in on the thread, at approx 2/3rds of the thread we had 100% clear view at 35yards, locked off with the retaining ring it remaained that way for several sessions, we were then able to use the scope as one would normally do adjusting for 25 yards, 40 yards & even 50yards…
Mind you, at 50 yards it is a tad blurred, I’d max out at 45yards in this case.

This saved us a few dollars on a better scope which will will eventually purchase, perhas when we purchase our next rifle.

Like yourself I would prefer to use only pellets & have my boys now loading the single shots like a pro, perhaps taking a dozen loads before it became second nature, if only they had used a 2nd stage or a button push to impliment a second reciever for the single pellets.

As it is a duel ‘ammo’ rifle we did attempt BBs in the earlier stages of the boys learning their safety & procedural use of the rifle, here we found that the recmmended twist from side to side loading several shots as you say was frustrating, however, whilst twisting side to side steadily, if you were to adjust the left turn so that the rifle rises by approx 15 degrees the BBs do indeed load into the ‘slot’ ready for use.

But here comes a slight problem, many times we would have to shake out the BBs (plural) in the ‘chamber’ as 90% of the time we would see not one but two BBs being pulled in by the magnetic parts.

============

Again, thank you for a wonderful website filled with great revies & info.

It really helped a ‘starter’ family pick their first air rifle.

<3 Dr Torchwood.

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirDUDE

AirDUDE — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:49:29 +0000

Hey Rick, I was wondering, which gun you would choose between the Crosman G1 Extreme, and the Crosman Quest 1000X? Also is the Quest hold sensitive at all?

Comment on Beretta PX4 Storm Recon – VIDEO by birdmove

birdmove — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:25:34 +0000

Nice review on what sounds like a great airgun. I just picked up a new Walther CP99 Compact Recon and it’s a BB repeater and comes with what looks like the same green dot scope as your Storm Recon came with,. The CP99 Compact series are all BBs only.It also has slide blowback action and the slide stays open after the last shot.One good thing about the Walther is that, with the scope/green dot mounted, you can still fully use the open sights (unlike what I’ve read about the Storm Recon).I was quite impressed with the accuracy my gun is capable of when using the green dot and a rest.I’ve got groups as tight as 1/4″ for three shots at about 18-20 feet-thats slow fire.Many groups slow fire are around an inch, but I’m getting a fair number of tighter ones too.I’m happy with the green dot sight too, as this gun doesn’t have adjustable sights, and mine are off a bit.

Take care, Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by fabio seixas

fabio seixas — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:01:29 +0000

Amazing. Just installed the open sight produced by the Mendoza
and the problem was solved. Guess it must be something wrong in the
manufacuring or assembling of the peepsight itself.
The gun is back on target again, but still cant get in touch with
with the company.
fabio

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by marincorps

marincorps — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:12:40 +0000

thanks

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:41:40 +0000

Wish I could help… I took off the peep sight and mounted a scope…

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:13:36 +0000

It is a fairly large pistol. I’d just take it down to a local shop and size one for it.

Hope that helps.

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:13:07 +0000

yes.. take a look at PyramydAir.com

Rick

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:12:47 +0000

yep..

Rick

Comment on Archer Airguns QB78 Deluxe – VIDEO! by birdmove

birdmove — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:51:42 +0000

Rick, thanks for the review of the QB78 Deluxe. I have been aware of Archer Airguns for a while now, and have communicated with Steven Archer a few times.He is also quite active on the forum on Chinese airguns at this web address: http://www.network54.com/Forum/113813/

If you haven’t been to Archer Airguns websight, you should check it out. They sell a bunche of interesting air rifles including the QB57. However, the one that I would love to see you do a review and/or video of is the AR2078 “Custom”. Here it is:

http://www.archerairguns.com/AR2078A-Custom-Chinese-Air-Rifle-p/ar2078ac.htm

It is based on the QB78, but with a way different stock and some other changes too.You can get it in the other models with aperture and open sights, but the AR2078 Custom is without sights and set up for scopes.I’ve heard very good things about these more target-quality rifles, and at $170-$180 they sound like a good buy too.I would get one in .177 caliber as thats what I’m getting more and more commited to.

Anuway, take care, Rick, and keep up the good work.

Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by birdmove

birdmove — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:43:17 +0000

Hi, Rick.Pyramidair.com is having a nice Fathers Day 15% discount. I ordered a Crosman C11, in part due to your video review and that big grin on your face after you fired the C11!! I had already ordered a Crosman 357W also.Also both guns get very good reviews at Pyramid Air.I like the 357W as it has not only a fully adjustable sight, but you can also mount a scope or red dot on it easily I understand.The C11 gets fine reviews, and everyone says it’s really comfortable and reliable to shoot and gets a good number of shots per CO2 cartridge.If I really like the C11, I may also get a C11 Tactical with the extended barrel and the included scope rail.I’ve never used a laser scope, but did a lot of NRA hunter pistol matches years ago using my TC Contender and an old Aimpoint red dot scope.My best barrel was in .357Mag, but I used .38 Special cases and 110 grian JHP bullets over a moderate charge of Bullseye powder.You don’t need big power for NRA hunter pistol shooting, but you do need excellant accuracy, and I won a lot of matches with that setup, and it was enough to knock down the 100 meter rams reliably.
I don’t have a pellet trap that is made for BBs, just a couple of standard pellet traps, so I may have to shoot into a cardboard box like you use in the C11 video.
Take care, and I stop by your website all the time.Keep up the good work, Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by fabio seixas

fabio seixas — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:47:11 +0000

Salutes from Brasil.
Regarding the Mendoza Rm2800 peep sight I’m experiencing the same problem, the windage regulation has to be adjusted to the extreme
right.
I’ve been trying to contact the manufacturer but with no success.
May be some of you guys could help me with the problem?
There are only 3 Rm2800 in my country and we all are having the
same problem.
Thanks in advance
fabio

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by marincorps

marincorps — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:37:42 +0000

is there a holster if so were do i get it

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by marincorps

marincorps — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:20:50 +0000

are there speed loaders for the 357 if so were do i get them

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by marincorps

marincorps — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:11:00 +0000

does the whole cylender spin on each shot

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 11 May 2009 12:50:04 +0000

I’m sure it would.. I just have not had the time to get one and try it. The front of the scope needs to be raised slightly to compensate for the barrel. With that corrected.. you can shoot 1 hole groups at 15 yards with kodiaks. See this post: http://www.airgunweb.com/2008/03/bam-b26-and-beeman-kodiak-pellets-wow/

Same gun.
Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sun, 10 May 2009 11:21:18 +0000

an adjustable scope mount wont help?

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 09 May 2009 12:47:18 +0000

I’ve got one .22 that the barrel slipped out when someone was cocking the gun.. now it shoots really high. It holds .5″ groups at 40 yards with kodiaks… but is not useable up close.. bummer really. BAM won’t return my calls or emails about getting the barrel replaced.. I spoke ill of one of their rifles and they have not had anything to do with me since. FYI it was their B28. I had a pre-production version that had a malfunctioning trigger. I’d love to open a dialogue with them again.. For the most part, they can build some nice guns.

Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sat, 09 May 2009 09:42:43 +0000

got any left that you want to part with? i prefer 22 also

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 09 May 2009 04:56:52 +0000

it’s pretty accurate.. I like the .22 over the .177.. but that is just me. I was buying them by the case directly from BAM.. This was a while back.

Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Fri, 08 May 2009 13:31:21 +0000

is it just as accurate as the ‘old’ as the old model and who was your supplier? looking foward to more reviews. they are very helpful

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 07 May 2009 14:44:31 +0000

I have no idea why they aren’t around. I had some way back in .22 and they were great… can’t find them at all anymore.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by itsnotom

itsnotom — Thu, 07 May 2009 12:36:43 +0000

odd that PA has both listed with the 1000 being 10 bucks less

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by itsnotom

itsnotom — Thu, 07 May 2009 11:05:33 +0000

do you have any idea why cylindrical pellets are not made anymore(except .20)? i would think that since they are bullet shaped,they would be more accurate along with higher velocity. any help would be appreciated and i ‘stole’ your idea about using a plano utility box to hold my pellets. it works great! i also like to have a variety on hand and carrying around all those tins was a reall pain in the butt.

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 06 May 2009 12:02:44 +0000

You can try using some Crosman Pellgunoil to see if it will bring the seals back to life.. outside of that, you may be looking at having to rebuild the pistol.

Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 06 May 2009 11:53:33 +0000

BAM updated the B26 in between reviews. They enlarged the compression chamber slightly and it generated more power. The newer versions will really crank for a small, lightweight, springer.

Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 06 May 2009 11:52:23 +0000

I do recommend the b26… it is one of my favorite rifles.

Rick

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by zack

zack — Wed, 06 May 2009 02:02:05 +0000

hi Rick,
I have a crosman 38T revoler co2 pellet pistol. this pistol is awesome, its pretty old, my grandpa gave it to me. Every time i try to put in a new co2 it all leaks out really fast before you can even shoot. do you have any advice to fix this problem?

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Tue, 05 May 2009 10:58:21 +0000

and it was shooting cp hps at 730? your review was in the 600,s

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Tue, 05 May 2009 10:55:47 +0000

do you still recommend it?

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 05 May 2009 01:57:16 +0000

you can.. just make sure that it is the right lubricant or it can damage your gun. Beeman makes a silicon lubricant formulated for spring guns.

Rick

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 05 May 2009 01:34:50 +0000

yep… it was the 26.

Rick

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by itsnotom

itsnotom — Mon, 04 May 2009 10:04:37 +0000

i thought the chamber needed to have a drop of oil every once in awhile for the seal.

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sat, 02 May 2009 11:53:26 +0000

was this the bam 26? im thinking of getting one

Comment on 2300T from Crosman’s Custom Shop! by photomunkey

photomunkey — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:33:18 +0000

Hi, it’s Eric with a follow-up. I went in and took the trigger apart and found some rough areas which needed to be smoothed out. If you get one with a rough feel to the trigger (mine had a slight catch in it) this is easily done by taking off the pistol grip and metal cover plate on the right side of the pistol.

The accuracy of the appears to be limited more to my skill at 10 yards, than to any fault with the pistol itself. It definitely prefers a lightweight “wadcutter” and WILL shoot pellets easily into a nickle-sized hole. I’m afraid I’m just not any better than that though.

I’m hoping to get some nice wood target grips with my tax return money this year though! We’ll see how I do then!

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by photomunkey

photomunkey — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:28:18 +0000

Hi y’all! This is Eric, adding a little update. Rick did chrono the TF-89 before sending it out, but only with two pellets, the RWS Hobby and the Crosman Premier Domed. With the Hobby, the 89 generated an average of 849 fps. With the Premier Domed, 768 fps. The results were remarkably consistent, only varying by 3-4 fps per shot!

Hobby pellets didn’t group so well. I used some RWS SuperDomes and they were pretty good, but it wasn’t until I tried the Crosman Premium Pointed pellets that the groups tightened up dramatically!

I like to shoot the ends of soda cans, as that curved end is highly visible even in low light, and I have a LOT of soda cans to go through at any given time! I’ve got photos of 5 or 6 pellets going into one small hole in the bottom, and coming out the “pour hole” in the top of three cans, without touching (or barely nicking) the sides of the pour holes! Remarkable performance really!

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:55:57 +0000

From what I understand… the only difference is where you by it and who warrantees it. The Quest 1000x is a Crosman Supported product, sold through sporting goods stores. The Storm is sold through Wal-mart and I’m not sure how the warranty works. I may be wrong, but that is what I’ve heard.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by itsnotom

itsnotom — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:51:08 +0000

what is the difference with this and the storm xt?

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:06:16 +0000

Will do.

Rick

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by itsnotom

itsnotom — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:51:23 +0000

let me know if you decide to sell anything

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:18:30 +0000

yes it sure is….

Rick

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by itsnotom

itsnotom — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:27:24 +0000

im sure you house is getting full.lol

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by Edi D

Edi D — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:03:13 +0000

Hi there !
Love your input !!! I already have the 357…very happy with it…but i am looking into getting a c21 or a c31 but i will wait for your overview. If they are similar as far as performance goes (speed and accuracy) i will end up getting the c31…a bit smaller and it has that “fancy” holster
Thanks !!!!!

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:18:12 +0000

Pretty much.. Only Crosman does not let me keep the products.. yet… I’m working on them. If the want me to keep reviewing their stuff, they’ll change their policies.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:06:54 +0000

It is fun.

Rick

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:04:53 +0000

Don’t have the 21 yet.. Maybe we’ll get one in.

Rick

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by itsnotom

itsnotom — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:45:59 +0000

and do you get to keep everything you test?

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:03:07 +0000

i would kill to be able to do what you do there.

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:53:55 +0000

are any of them the 21? i just got the BAM 21 and its one sweet rifle. only 114.00.

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:20:05 +0000

Jordan,

To answer your first question… you only need a drop on the tip of each CO2 cartridge. As for the second question…. I don’t think it is that loud.. but I would not be shooting hundreds of rounds at 11:00 PM or 5:30 AM if you get my drift. It definitely makes some noise.

Hope that helps.

Rick

Comment on Crosman C11 Pistol – Practical Shooting Training Tool – VIDEO by jordan

jordan — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:39:53 +0000

hey nice video!! I was just wondering if you could anwser two questions. 1st how much pell gun oil should I put on the cylinders because my buddy put way too much and became a mess in the internal mechinisms! 2nd and is it loud because my neighbors might call the authorities on me because it might be loud. (I dont have a very good relationship with my neighbors!!) also airguns are legal were I live but I dont want to make them mad!!

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:03:00 +0000

Glad you liked it. I like that rifle too. I just let mine go as I just have too many airguns around and no place to put them. Anyway, enjoy. Every now and then put some oil on the pump piston to keep it lubricated.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:56:57 +0000

Hey There,

If you are looking for realism, go with the Pro 77. It is not terribly fast or accurate, but it does feel pretty real. The C11 is great for speed and accuracy. If you can save you money for a while and want both.. go fore the Beretta PX4 Storm or Storm Recon. That will give you the best of both worlds.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by birdmove

birdmove — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:14:50 +0000

Rick, just thought I’d leave you a message because I just today bought a new Remington Airmaster 77. I had bought a new Crosman 1077 combo (with a Centerpoint 4×32 scope) and have been shooting it, but mostly in cold temps, so it’s not been a good environment for a CO2 airgun.I’m looking forwards to seeing what that gun can do in the warmer temps coming soon. Then I picked up my first springer-a Beeman model 1024 break down rifle with scope (that cheap Chinese 4×20 you see on many inexpensive air rifles).That scope is terrible, so I got a Leapers 4×32 with adj objective that is clear as a bell.I’ve got some good groups with that gun, the best being into about .135″ center to center at 39 feet. But the gun is driving me nuts with inconsistancy. Same pellet,same everything will suddenly open up to a wide group, or change the point of impact.The gun even changed its mind as for what its favorite pellet is (after I’d bought a quantity of a couple it loved for a while).
So, today, I bought a Remington Airmaster 77.First I shot it a little with the open sights, and it grouped pretty well at 10 yards.Windage was right on, it just shot slightly low, so sighting in was a snap. I then decided to go ahead and install the scope.It appears to be the same one that came with my Beeman. But, the one on the Beeman, no matter what I did, just would not clear up and give me any kind of clarity.Luckily, the one that came with the Airmaster, is at least pretty clear, so I can actually see the target. I easily sighted in the scope in about five shots, and started trying different pellets.All shooting so far has been at ten yards.I am loving this gun! The Airmaster I have is in no way picky about pellets.This is the first air rifle I’ve had that loves the (highly recomended), RWS Hobbys, and it really loves them!It also loves Gamo Match wadcutters,Beeman Laser Sports,Beeman Silver Bears,and likes Gamo Magnums also. It’s not wild about the Crosman Premier wadcutters, and I noticed that they seemed to act like they were smaller in diameter than the other pellets (as in they went into the breech too easily).All shooting was using five pumps.
The trigger on this gun is easily better than the ones on the Beeman and the Crosman. Also the gun is very quiet which is important to me.
I am going to leave the cheap scope on the Airmaster I think.I am getting some great one hole groups at 10 yards, and I don’t want to mess with success.
A $69.00 dollar air rifle that shoots like this is a find!! We’ll see what happens at longer distances soon.
Anyway, Rick, your writeup, and Tom Gaylords at Pyramid Air, and generally good reviews of this gun, and the fact that it has a metal receiver, prompted me to look at one.

Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by jordan

jordan — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:49:29 +0000

Hey….. good video! I want a pistol thats realistic and im debating if I should get the pro77 or the c11. the c11 is cheeper but the pro77 feels more realistic because of its blowback. but Im tryin to keep my budget under 50.00. (the pro77 at my local sporting goods store is 70.99.) the cll is 40.00. what do you think???????????

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:04:40 +0000

I will take a look at the Ruger when I have time. I know Pyramyd will let me have one for review. I’ve got a couple other of their products right now that I’m working with and need to get them off my plate first. Thanks for the comments.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by zack

zack — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:01:58 +0000

Hey Rick, this review was great. I saw the video on youtube and thought it was cool. The video reviews that you make are very cool and i learn alot. I just bought a ruger airhawk and it is simiar to the crossmen quest. It is a break barrel in .177 and is advertised at 1000 fps. it has wood stocks and a 4 by 32 scope on it. the crossmen premier hollows shoot exellent in the ruger airhawk. I wanted to ask if you would reveiw this gun, possibly a video. at pyramyd air it is only alittle over 100 bucks.

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:44:59 +0000

I’v got a review of the TechForce 59 from Eric that I need to post. I should have it up and going by the end of the week. I’ve got a Gamo Big Cat in for testing and I’ve got the Gamo Hunter Extreme coming back from repair. On top of all that, I’ve got a bunch of new TechForce models coming in. Should be a busy Summer!

Rick

Comment on Compasseco’s TF-89 aka “Hammerin’ Hank” by itsnotom

itsnotom — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:29:09 +0000

it would have been interesting to see a chrono of the gun but otherwise a very good read. whats next on the testing block?

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:20:59 +0000

Hey there… Thank you for the kind words… I’ve tried hard to be fair with everything that I video or write about. Good news… I have both the 21 and 31 in from crosman for review. I’ll be getting to them once the weather is nicer. One thing to note… the function of both is exactly the same as the c11. The changes are all cosmetic. The sights are nicer and the shape seems better.. but the velocity is exactly the same.

Cheers.

Rick

Comment on 7 Crosman Pistols – VIDEO by brotherpaul

brotherpaul — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:05:08 +0000

Excellent review , and generally your presentations are great and very thourough . One of the best reviewers I have been watching and few of the people I trust . Congratulations again mr. Eutsler , I love your work . One small question/request if you have any info. What about the c21 and c31 models from crosman ? If you come across them i would love to see a review

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:41:03 +0000

The 78 Deluxe is a totally different rifle and well worth the extra money. I had one for review but a friend of mine was over and would not leave without me selling it to him. I’m still waiting for the replacement from Compasseco. I miss that rifle.

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by itsnotom

itsnotom — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:10:11 +0000

i recently got the 78 deluxe and it does not have any of the problems you have with this one. and it is extremley accurate.

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:22:55 +0000

Unfortunately most of the low end pellet rifles don’t get any testing before they hit the store shelves. Crosman is a good example of that.

Rick

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by wolvesspeak

wolvesspeak — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:44:33 +0000

Thanks for this post! It was very informative.
I had a question regarding the Crossman Powermaster 66. I recently purchased one from a local Walmart. When I got home I was disappointed and somewhat worried that the aim was off, significantly enough that I checked the straightness of my rifle and discovered that the steel rifle tube did not perfectly align with the plastic action and stock. However, I tinkered with the scope a bit and managed to zero it. I didn’t even try the ironsights yet. But I was wondering, do most air rifles come right out of the factory without any calibration of some sort? I want to know if I should return it and try a different rifle, but the same model. Thanks!

Wolvesspeak

Comment on TechForce® QB78 Review by birdmove

birdmove — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:48:48 +0000

Nice review, Gerald. I assume your QB78 was in .177 caliber? It’s available in .177 and .22. Almost every owner review I’ve been able to find for this gun just raves about it.The solid steel receiver is a bonus over the Crosman 2260, although those guns too get very good reviews. You got some very nice groups there.I have a Crosman 1077 CO2 rifle, and it’s not known for great accuracy.I’m still experimenting with pellets.I had high hopes fpr the RWS Hobbys, but they just don’t group well in my gun.My gun likes Crosman Premier wadcutters,Gamo Match wadcutters,and very much likes the Gamo Masterpoints.

Take care, Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on Crossman 1077 Final Look….. maybe by birdmove

birdmove — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:32:17 +0000

I’ve had a chance to do some shooting with my 1077 with Centerpoint 4×32 scope.Its been cold, which is hard on this 55 year old shooter, and not the best for a CO2 gun.I’m shooting from a table and small portable bench rest at a measured 39 feet/13 yards.So far I’m just trying out various pellets to find some promising candidates for best accuracy.I had hopes for the RWS Hobby, as someone suggested I try that one, but it’s not doing the job in my gun.I got an assortment of Gamo pellets,the RWS Hobby,Beeman Silver Bear,Beeman Laser Sport,and Crosman Premier wadcutters.So far, the best have been the Crosman Premier,Gamo Match wadcutters,Gamo Masterpoints, and the Beeman Silver Bears, in order of best to worst.I’ve had some nice groups, but many spoiled by one stinking flyer!!The only “perfect” group was with the Crosman Premiers, and it is about 1/2 inch-that’s total size outside to outside, and not subtracting the .177 size for the pellet diameter.I have one great 4-shot group with the Gamo Masterpoints that is right at 1/4 inch, and that’s also outside measurements, but that has a 5th shot flyer that ruined it!!
The 1077 functions well, but that trigger!!I keep running out of breath trying to squeeze that trigger, and have to stop the squeeze and take another breath, and then continue.I found out that if you stop the trigger squeeze, and then let off on the trigger, that the clip will then skip one round (or hole in the clip) when you restart the squeeze, so thats when I learned to just stop the squeeze but don’t let up on the trigger,take another breath, and then continue.I can’t speak to velocity, as I don’t have a chronograph.
I’m hoping to pick 4-5 decent pellets for this gun, and then when the weather warms up, I’ll try to get better groups with less flyers. In the cold it’s just to hard not to rush the shots.I’ll try to shoot at 25 yards if I have the room, and hope the groups don’t open up too much at the longer distance.My 4×32 scope may limit things a bit too.I’d like to try a higher power scope. But then this gun isn’t know to be a tack driver, and as a repeater, wasn’t really designed for that kind of accuracy.But its fun to shoot, and lets me keep my skills (or lack of!!) shooting right in my own back yard.
Take care, Jon in Puyallup, Wa.

Comment on 2300T from Crosman’s Custom Shop! by birdmove

birdmove — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:12:36 +0000

Nice writeup.It’s funny, because about an hour ago, I walked through the steps at the Custom Shop on this same gun just to see what was available.I didn’t buy one. I would choose a .177 barrel as I will soon have three airguns in that caliber and would then just have to buy pellets in that caliber.In my mockup I went with the stock grips also, and the stock front sight.Hope you will follow up when you get some targets as to the accuracy of your new airgun.
Have fun, Jon

Comment on Crossman 1077 Final Look….. maybe by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:43:40 +0000

Jon,

I’m glad that you got into the site. I’ve got the rifle sitting out in the shed. I’ll pull it out and run some pellets through it again just for fun. I need to wait for some warmer weather. I bet it would be a good indoor basement gun as long as you had a good trap.

Thanks for the post.

Rick

Comment on Crossman 1077 Final Look….. maybe by birdmove

birdmove — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:30:11 +0000

Thanks,Rick, for fixing my logging in problem!!
As I mentioned to you in my email, I ordered a Crosman 1077 co2 repeating rifle as you tested here in your blog.I do think your test gun had a defect with those very low velocities you got.I’m hoping you might test another one and give the gun another chance. I do know of other owners that are getting 1/2″ 25 yard groups regularly from a bench, and I’m hoping mine will do likewise.
I’ve read what I can find about the gun, and there have been a fair number of problems with gas leaks.But maybe these owners haven’t been putting a drop of the Pellgunoil on the cartridges as they put them in the gun(??).I tend to like to experiment for handloads in powder guns, and will be trying various pellets in this gun when I get it.I’m going to stick with the small co2 cartridges and take my time shooting.I hear, when you really rapid fire this gun,your velocity will drop ruining accuracy.
Anyway, thanks for the very prompt fix mentioned above, and I’ll be hanging around this very cool blog and reading (and watching the videos) of your tests and other articles.I’m a rooky at airguns, but have been shooting powder guns for about 45 years and done some long range mettalic handgun competition, and some very fun bowling pin matches too.

Take care, Jon

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:31:14 +0000

Kevman,

It is good to be back writing again. I had to take some time off.. got a little burned out. Anyway, I’d call Gamo’s customer service and see if you can just order the parts directly from them. If that doesn’t work let me know.

Thanks for the comments.

Rick

Comment on Crosman Quest 1000 – VIDEO by kevman

kevman — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:10:53 +0000

Hey Rick, Got a quick question for you. I have a Gamo CFX and I need the whole trigger group. Any ideas where I could pick one up. From what I can tell the sear has either worn or is broken off. A sear would work but I would like to go with the GRT trigger when I get it running again. I purchased the gun from a friend and new it had a few problems i.e. broken spring, etc. Any help would be appreciated. Keep up the good work and glad to see you back with the reviews.
Kevin

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:12:52 +0000

Well Randy…

From what you are saying.. I think you like the mendoza trigger? Yeah it is a wonderful trigger in such an inexpensive rifle. I recently picked up another RM 200 this time in .177 and it seems that it was some older stock when RWS was importing them. So far I can’t tell you how happy I am with the performance. You are right about the 800 FPS. That is what I’m getting out of mine with hobbies. I’m hoping to do another review on the RM 200 this time in .177 so I’ll let you know when that happens. As for the 950.. sorry.. I don’t have that rifle anymore. I gave it to my brother in law up in VT so he could keep the little varmints out of his garden. If my memory serves me right however, I believe I was getting mid 600′s with the GH950. I have the newer Beeman SS1000-h with the interchangeable barrels which feels and shoots just about exactly the same. I’ll run some pellets through that tomorrow and let you know what I get.
As for my thoughts on the Contender 89. So far, other than like a Bam B40, it is the nicest, most accurate Chinese rifle that I’ve ever shot. I’ve had only a few issues and they are with the open sights. They are really bad. My front sight has fallen apart and the rear sight was never stable. Seeing as I use a scope, it is not a big deal.
If you are looking for 1 gun that will last you a couple of years.. You should really consider the new Benjamin Discovery. Mine is sooting Beeman Kodiak’s over 700 FPS and JSB Diabolo Exacts shoot .25″ groups at 25 yards. I know it is a lot of money for the rifle and the scope, but it will make you want to just put all your springers up in the closet. The Discovery is not without its own issues, but I’ll get to those in the next review.

Hope to hear from you again soon, and thank you so much for your comments.

AirHead

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by randy

randy — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:27:12 +0000

HI AIRHEAD, I LOVE YOUR SITE. A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO I BOUGHT THE MENDOZA RM200 177. I WAS LOOKING FOR A MEDIUM SIZE 177, HOPEING IT WAS IN THE RANGE OF THE R7. WELL IT WASNT ITS WAY TO POWERFULL I CANT CHECK IT BUT IM SURE IT WAS SHOOTING RWS HOBBYS AT 800 FTPS AFTER SHOOTING 1000 ROUNDS THRU IT TO REMOVE MOST OF THE DESELING. AND LIKE YOU SAID ABOUT THE TRIGGER, ITS GREAT. I HONESTLY HAVE NOT FIRED A AIR GUN WITH A MORE PERFECT LIGHT AND CRISP TRIGGER. EVEN WITH MY DADS EXPENSIVE OLD GERMAN GUNS LIKE WIENARC SOMETHING. I BROUGHT IT OUT TO 29 PALMS FAMILY CAMPEING GETTOGETHER AND OUT OF MY BEEMAN GS950 (SPANISH 22 WHICH IS A GREAT GUN) RWS 350 MAG 177, AND THIS OTHER REAL 22 SMALL RIFLE I HAD GREEN LASER SIGHTS AND WAS SHOOTING THAT NEW AGUILARA 550 AND 750 FTPS AMMO. I COULDNT STOP SHOOTING THE RM 200 AND THAT WAS WITHOUT A SCOPE. SO I KNOW WHAT YOUR SAYING ABOUT SPENDING TIME WITH A GOOD FRIEND. DID I HAPPEN TO SAY THAT I LIKED ITS TRIGGER, SORRY. ANY WAY THE MAIN REASON FOR WRITEING YOU IS AFTER READING YOUR ARTICLE ON TECH FORCE 89, IM GOING TO BUY ONE. I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THE BEST BUY IN HIGH POWER 22 SPRINGER AND I THOUGHT I WOULD HAVE TO BUY ANOTHER RWS 350 MAG IN 22. WHEN I BOUGHT THE 350 IN 177 IT WAS QUITE A PENNY WHEN I ADDED THE 3X12X40 SCOPE, SO I WAS HOPEING NOT TO DO THAT AGAIN. ON YOUR REVIEW OF THE 89 WITH CP PELLETS AT 800 FTPS ITS ONLY ABOUT 30 FTPS SHYER THAN THE 350 THAT I KNOW IS ALSO A HONEST REVIEW OF THE GUN LIKE YOURS IS. OK IF YOUR STILL AWAKE HERES MY QUESTION. SINCE MY WIFE DOESNT BELIEVE I HAVE AIR GUN BLOOD CIRCULATING IN ME AND THIS IS GOING TO BE MY LAST GUN FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AT LEAST, YOU SAID YOU HAD A BEEMAN GS 950 IN 22. CAN YOU DO A SHORT WRITE UP ON IT AND USEING CROSSMAN PELLETS IN THE BOX CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT IS THE EXACT SPEED THAT GUN SPITS THEM OUT, IM GUESSING ABOUT 700 FPS. REMEMBER YOU SAID WHILE COMPAREING THE BEEMAN TO THE 89 THE BEEMAN WAS LIKE A POP GUN. SINCE I CANT BUY MORE GUNS I DEFINATLY CANT BUY A FPS TESTER. PLEASE UNDERSTAND I TRY TO KEEP THE PEACE WITH MY BELOVIN AND SHES WORTH MORE THAN AIR GUNS. THANKS FOR REPLYING TO MY EMAIL, AND DID I EVER TELL YOU HOW MUCH I LIKED THAT TRIGGER? I WAS THINKING ABOUT GETTING THE MENDOZA 600 MAGNUM BUT I COULDNT FIND ANY REVIEWS EVEN CLOSE TO 800 FTPS AND BESIDES I LIKE USEING THE CP PELLETS FOR THERE PRICE AND THE ROUNDED HEAD MAKES THEM FLY FASTER DOWNRANGE THAN FLAT HEADS FOR MORE ENERGY AT TARGET, IF I COULD GIVE 1 BAD MARK ON THE MENDOZA ITS THE BARREL IS TO FAT REQUIREING FATTER PELLETS. THANKS AGAIN, RANDY

Comment on BAM B26 and Beeman Kodiak Pellets….. wow… by Glenners

Glenners — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:38:15 +0000

U shood try the H&N FTT 5,54

They ar the graytest pellets eveer in low power(sub) airguns.

(sorry my bad english)

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:05:20 +0000

Peter,

Thank you for your comments. I really like my 77 and I pick it up often for small pest elimination and some target practice. I’m currently working with a Benjamin Blue Steak .20 cal. I can’t wait to post the review. What a nice rifle.

AirHead.

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by peter

peter — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:29:56 +0000

What a history this gun has! Originally it was the Crosman 766 in 1975. In 1978 the 2nd generation came out as the Crosman 766 American Classic. That’s what I got started with at the age of 14. I really miss that gun. I fell and bent the barrel around 1983. I replaced the barrel, but it was never the same. I ended up giving it away. I still have the 1981 vintage Crosman 1377 American Classic Pistol that looked just like the 766 rifle and it still works fine. The 3rd generation of the 766 was made in 1981-82. Its hard to imagine that it’s successor, the Crosman 2100 has been made since 1983. I like the look of the Crosman version better. Brown plastic and black barrel.
American multi-pumps Crosman, Benjamin-Sheridan or Daisy. Best values ever in an air gun!

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:44:43 +0000

Dear PistonJackson,

I’ve been shooting the TFC 89 a lot lately and it is still performing very well. I’ve had a few cosmetic “issues” that have come up, i.e. the front sight assembly fell apart, but all in all the rifle is getter better as time goes on. I’ve been planing a follow up article and video, but time has not permitted either. I’ve also been expanding my range to allow for much longer shots so I hope to get shot groups out to 50 yards. I’ll move this rifle up the list for everyone. I just got in the Benjamin Discovery .22 PCP rifle so keep your eyes open for that review.

Thanks.

AirHead.

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by pistonjackson

pistonjackson — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:15:22 +0000

Hey AirHead. This review has me very interested in this rifle now at $150. When are you making a follow up? I would like to know how much louder it can be than a Gamo Shadow 1000 and can you post more target groups with other pellets? Thanks.

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:30:14 +0000

Dear Blindbatbill,

Thanks for your comments. I’m not familiar with the RWS P5, but I’ll add it to my list of review requests so that I can eventually take a look at it. You may want to check over at PyramydAir’s blog to see if Tom’s had any experience with it.

Hope to hear from you again soon.

AirHead

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by Blindbatbill

Blindbatbill — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:22:48 +0000

I have this gun 3576w 177 pellet and it is awsome at 11 yards it shoots like a dream with crossman premier hollow points but i have a ? about a gun i just recently bought it is a RWS p5 magnum ive shot mabe 300 rounds and it still does not shoot as good as my 357 crossman. it seems to shoot to the right if i aim left and low at the shatterblast targets its on ive try adjusting the windage and seems to have no effect

Comment on Crosman 1760 SE – VIDEO REVIEW! by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:34:16 +0000

Kevin,

Thanks for your comments. I just got another rifle in that is very much like the 1760SE. As soon as I’ve had some time with it, I’ll post another review!

Thanks again.

Rick

Comment on Crosman 1760 SE – VIDEO REVIEW! by kevman

kevman — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:05:32 +0000

Another option that might be of interest concerning the sights is the Daisy 5589 receiver sight. One came with my Avanti 853 but makes a welcome edition to my Crosman 2300 Crbine or my 2260/1760. It also gave me a reason to completely eliminate the factory rear sight.
Great review

Kevin

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:02:52 +0000

Dear Kevin,

Thank you for your comments. Feel free to send me some pictures of your rifle and the game you’ve taken. I’m considering starting a viewer photo gallery. When you have some time, please take a look at the videos. I’d like to know what you think.

AirHead

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by kevman

kevman — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:03:27 +0000

Great review. I have an Avanti 853 Legend that gets around 480 to 490 fps with crosman pointed field but as most of my shooting is 25 yards and under havent found it to be much of a problem. English sperrows are a considered a pest in this part of the country and there is no limit on the by the game dept. and I have found it to be an excellent challenge to try them in the fencerows only taking headshots. You need all the accuracy you can get and these rifle deliver in that department. Great work your doing, keep it up

Kevin

Comment on Daisy 22 SG – VIDEO REVIEW! by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:25:48 +0000

Hello again!

I’m glad to see your comments yet again on the site. I just got an email from Daisy with some really disappointing news . They are no longer offering the 22 SG! Also, they told me that they built the rifle to be accurate at 10 yards so the fact that I was getting decent groups at 15 yards and hit 3 out of 5 at 25 yards on “Harold” really says something about the little rifle. I’ll try to keep mine away from garage doors.

AirHead

Comment on Daisy 22 SG – VIDEO REVIEW! by VerminatorSA

VerminatorSA — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:26:25 +0000

Great review on a great rifle. I will have to put mine on a chrony and see what kind of numbers I get. Like you said, lots of steel and wood. The plastic handle flexes a bit around 10 pumps, and I believe after about 15 pumps it does not want to lock in place. Other than that, the rifle is solid. I accidentally dropped my garage door on it, which left a large scratch on the barrel and upper stock. I gave the gun up for dead, but about a month ago I resurrected it and it seems to be shooting just fine, considering what it went through. I may have to re-scope it.

Another quality comparison note…the pump piston is very well constructed, using metal, and the proper washers for sealing. My Crosman 1322, uses a cheap plastic pump piston, which almost everyone replaces. All in all, it is a decent rifle for the $$.

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:23:08 +0000

Dear TDLJAZZ,

Thank you for your comments. We are working on a couple of more videos so please keep your eye on the site.

AirHead

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by tdljazz

tdljazz — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:06:32 +0000

Nice Video Ricky and very informative.
Thanks,
TDLJAZZ

Comment on Crosman NightStalker Tactical with Red / Green Dot Scope, Tactical Flashlight, and Bi-Pod by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:36:22 +0000

Dear Cole5169,

I’m sorry that your experience with he NightStalker was so disappointing! I really liked mine and until your comments, everyone that I’ve spoken to loves it!

I agree that Crosman should have done a better job with the fit and finish (I mentioned this pretty extensively in the article), but mine performed great for day and night shooting. I’ll take accuracy over looks just about every time.

If fit and finish is what does it for you, take a look at the Beretta CX4 Storm. From what I hear the craftsmanship is excellent…. although all the reviewers that I’ve spoken with say it can’t hit the broad side of a barn.

With regards to your request that I start writing “honest reviews,” please note that I spend a lot of time trying to find something positive about everything I shoot as well as pointing out their short comings. In this article in particular, I mentioned many things that I would have liked to see improved or things that I was not thrilled with. My goal is not to run every product into the ground by rather to provide a balanced look at each product.

Regards.
AirHead

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:12:52 +0000

Dear Cole5169,

Don’t I feel like an idiot! I guess I’ve got some editing to do. Thanks for the correction!!!

AirHead

Comment on Crosman NightStalker Tactical with Red / Green Dot Scope, Tactical Flashlight, and Bi-Pod by cole5169

cole5169 — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:11:19 +0000

Fit of the plastic shell is poor. “Mohawk” sights are terrible. Magazine is hard to remove from receiver and to insert (poor design).

Weaver rails are not integral, and must be screwed on to sides or top. In any of the three positions available, the fit is terrible, since the rails are linear, and the receiver surface is not.

THIS RIFLE CANNOT BE “UNCOCKED” if there is gas remaining in the cylinder!

Clamping a bipod to a barrel (ESPECIALLY a thin-walled inner barrel inside a polymer shroud!) is a dumb idea, and everyone at Crosman knows better…

Disappointed in Crosman for this one. Was it really worth it for them to beat Umarex’s Beretta version to the market, if it costs them customer loyalty??

ps – Do an HONEST review for once.

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by cole5169

cole5169 — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:04:50 +0000

Sights are “Diopter”. Doppler is a kind of radar.

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:18:05 +0000

Dear VerminatorSA,

Thanks for the comments. The Crosman 357 is a whole lot of fun to shoot. You won’t be dissapointed!

AirHead

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:15:23 +0000

Dear VerminatorSA,

I agree with you about the cheap plastic. Funny you should mention the Powerline 822! I just shot a video review of that rifle this weekend. I hope to have it edited and ready to post in the next couple of days. I really like that rifle.

AirHead

Comment on Crosman 357 CO2 Pellet Revolver by VerminatorSA

VerminatorSA — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:18:38 +0000

Thanks for the review! I have been eying this gun for a while. The next time I see a local dealer selling one, it will be mine : )

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by VerminatorSA

VerminatorSA — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:15:19 +0000

I can’t get over the shinny cheap plastic they use… One of my first cheap air rifles I purchased was the Daisy Powerline 822. They used real wood and metal and it is a decent shooter. Last time I checked it retails for about $100, sold as a kit with a good 4×32 scope.

Comment on Remington AirMaster 77 Pump Rifle by JoeG

JoeG — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:32:04 +0000

Nice review Rick. I had the chance to by a refurb for $49 in December. I must admit I like the little rifle a lot. On the first shot I discovered I had an air leak from the valve. Very disapointed, you would think as a refurb they would have fixed this before reshipping out for sale. After taking it apart and polishing the inside of the valve it was working great. I did not even try the scope, stock that in the draw and mounted a Centerpoint 3×9-40. Wow what a great shooting little rife. And velocity is on par with yours.

Joe G from Jersey

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by JoeG

JoeG — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:16:21 +0000

Good work on the video review. Its always intresting that each rifle likes certin pellets better then others.

Joe G from Jersey

Comment on Velocities – What can we REALLY expect – VIDEO REVIEW! by VerminatorSA

VerminatorSA — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:50:22 +0000

Great video review! Keep up the good work.

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:23:58 +0000

Dear Joe,

Thanks for the comments. Looks like your 953 is getting better velocity than my sample from Daisy. I’ve got an email out to my rep to see if they have any input on the situation. Once I hear back, I’ll be sure to update the blog.

Thanks again.

Rick

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by JoeG

JoeG — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:33:11 +0000

Hia Rick,
Nice report on the 953. I bought a 953 a few months back for my 12 year old daughter. We both love to shoot the rifle. She wanted a scope, so I mounted a 6x Bug Buster on the rifle. In my testing for velocity my rifle shoots CPL’s at 458 FPS to 460 FPS; Beeman Lasers at 485 FPS; CPH’s at 360 FPS; and Crosman Silver Eagles at 543 FPS. The Daisy Manual that was shipped with my rifle states max velocity of 500 FPS. So my results are not too far off.

Joe G from Jersey

Comment on Daisy’s PowerLine® TargetPro 953 with Competition Sights by VerminatorSA

VerminatorSA — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:03:18 +0000

Looks like a great shooter! Keep up the good work.

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:16:17 +0000

Evan,

I’m sorry to hear that you had that much trouble with the B26. When did you get it? I communicate with the folks over at BAM pretty often. It is possible that I can get you the replacement parts or at least point you in the right direction if you like.

I’ll tell you that the B40 .22 is one awesome rifle. I like the .22 over the .177 any day. I’ve got both and the .22 is more accurate over a longer range. In fact I was shooting mine this afternoon. The difference between the B40 and many other springers in significant. The weight and balance really makes it easy to shoot. The only down side is that I could not see carrying that all day as a hunting gun. With a scope mine tops 13lbs.

If your not in a really big hurry, you may want to consider waiting for the Crosman Discovery. I’m on the short list to get one as soon as they come available. Crosman worked with Tom Gaylord to come up with an affordable PCP rifle that generates an honest 900 FPS in .22 with standard pellets. I’ve put all my purchases on hold for this to come out. Retail is 399 for the rifle and pump, but I believe PyramydAir will have them for a little less.

Too many choices and not near enough time or money!

AirHead

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by enlightenment

enlightenment — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:23:04 +0000

Hello again,

Thank you so much for your reply. Yes, BAM 26 is truely a affordable quality gun at its price. I had one actually, the power wasn’t much less then my norica marvic gold .22 (claimed 800~820 fps). The only problem i had with B26 was the stock eventually cracked, and the powerful dropped quite a lot, maybe was because the spring broken or seals died etc.. and I have no ideal how to fix them. what a pitty. I am now also interested in getting BAM 40. I think BAM 40 has better overal quality then Mendoza RM 2800?

Apart from the B26, I also have gamo shadow 1000 (.177) Gamo Hunter Extreme (1.77) and Norica Marvic Gold (.22) amount all the above, I found Norica is most reliable, with good power and accuracy. I have a bit problem with my hunter extreme regarding to get the accuracy as good as my norica, I think the size, weight and obvously the poor trigger pull cause my accuracy problem.

I normally hunt in farms, manily rabbit and pussoms. so I guess the range and power are quite important. I admire your knowledge in air guns and do feel really lucky to find your website.

Now I am in middle of process in deciding whether I should go for RM 2800 or BAM 40, and what caliber I should choose. if choose rm 2800, it going to be .22 thus shorter fire range, and open sight will be fun to try. I used M-14 back in my military service many years ago, normally shot at 300M with open sight, that is why i am considering try RM 2800. I know BAM 40 doesn’t have open sight at all, in your opinion, will that be best to choose .177 or .22 in BAM?

I am in New Zealand, almost everyone love hunting, and airguns are very popular here for small game hunting. In here, there is no power and special limit for importing air guns.

We don’t actually see too many BAM in here, and as far as I know, many people here actually want them, but purchasing from internet is always hassle (quality, warranty etc) and cost more (shipping and 12.5% GST tax if total value (goods+shipping)is above $290 USD or 400 NZD. However, as I am also in trading business I believe some low-medium priced rifles with reasonable quality will be the good seller in NZ.

Yes, I will be very interested in getting more of these options.

Thank you very much

Evan

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:24:02 +0000

Hello Again.

First of all let me say that I really like the some of the Mendoza line for their accuracy and price. The RM-200 is the best example of that. When you start getting into the $200 price tag, you have a lot of options like the CFX in .22 and RWS 34, and another personal favorite, the BAM B26. (the BAM B26 is my overall “best pick” for a Chinese / low cost break barrel.)

With regards to the “real” velocity from the Mendoza, you’ll only get that after about 250 to 500 pellets. It takes that long for the gun to stop dieseling and settle down. The open peep sights are really nice “if” you can get them to line up. I had some problems with my review gun. I’ve heard that I’m not the only one that has had such issues. Again, the BAM B26 has awesome open sights, can knock a squirrel off a branch at 20 yards, and likes cheap Crosman Hollow Point Premier pellets. I’ve got to update my review on the B26 as they recently upgraded the spring and it gets in the mid 700 FPS now.

As for the “synthetic” stock. I have the RM-200 in grey “synthetic” and it sure feels like painted wood to me! With that said, I LOVE MY RM-200. It may not have all the power of some other rifles, but I’ve learned how to take down small game with one shot kills. In populated areas, I actually prefer the RM-200 because the pellet stays in the game rather than passing straight thought like my B26. (B26 with RWS hollow points passed long ways through a squirrel at 15 yards)

Anyway, I hope I’ve answered some of your questions.

Please let me know what you decide and how it works out!

AirHead

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by enlightenment

enlightenment — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:10:19 +0000

Hello Airhead,
Thank you for your reply. yes, I thought the 2800 should be very close to 2000, apart from the stated power 950 fps and the different style plastic stock. however, when i read through the specification which provided by Pyramid air, it said the trigger pull is 5.5 lb not like dual trigger 2.5 lb as 2000 has.

I quite like the look and unique rear sight of Mandoza RM. and wish to buy a .22 cal for open sight hunting. the rm 600 seems to offer good power too 950 fps (giving the fact Mandoza seems over-rating the fps quite a bit, so i guess the true fps will be around 750~800) But then again, RM 600 seems only have normal rear sight (like other brands rifle) is that correct? and not a multi-shot.

I also heard a horrible review says the synthetic stock of Mandoza was actually painted on cheap wood. well, I guess that shouldn’t be possible, but just want to ask if anyone who has experience of Mandoza synthetic stock, how good it feel etc.

Sorry for so many questions, and thank you very much again

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:08:50 +0000

Hey there. I believe the 2800 is very close to the 2000, but I’ve not put my hands on one yet. If I can be any help, just let me know.

AirHead.

Comment on Mendoza .22 Break Barrel Rifle with Auto-loading Pellet System and Rear Peep Sight. by enlightenment

enlightenment — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:27:26 +0000

Hello everyone,
I am new to here and thank you for sharing your knowledge.

I am interested in purchasing Mendoza RM 2800, can anyone tell me more about this rifle?

Many thanks

Comment on KralAv’s Model AI:002, a CFX copy in .22. by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:43:51 +0000

Thanks for your comments.

I agree there are many better choices out there in the same price range.

Regards.

AirHead

Comment on KralAv’s Model AI:002, a CFX copy in .22. by beammeupscotty

beammeupscotty — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:07:41 +0000

An air rifle that groups 1.5″ at 15 yards with it’s favorite pellet, is a piece of junk, at any price. Why not call a spade, a spade? I can name several air rifles in the $100.00 to $160.00 price range that will shoot 1/4″ with iron sights at that range.

Contrary to your opening comments, Turkish guns are among the WORST air guns on the market. They are FAMOUS for their 10-12 lb. trigger pulls and persistent dieseling. Your review confirms this, while still being very kind to the rifle in your review. A gun like this is not worth the money, at any price.

I can SPIT better groups at 15 yards than this gun can shoot.

Comment on Crosman T4-Opts with Red-Dot Scope and Light by AirHead

AirHead — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:58:40 +0000

The regular T4 is a really nice pistol. I’m sure you will like having one. Once you’ve had some trigger time, let us know what you think of it.

Regards,

AirHead

Comment on Crosman T4-Opts with Red-Dot Scope and Light by krasin329

krasin329 — Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:15:42 +0000

man i want 1 so much thanks for telling me this 1 sucks and the one with out the (goodies) is way better than this 1 cause i want the 1 without the (goodies)

Comment on Crosman NightStalker Tactical with Red / Green Dot Scope, Tactical Flashlight, and Bi-Pod by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:20:25 +0000

Dear Dano,

I’m glad that you like the NightStalker. I found it to be a great rifle. You will find that you go through a lot of CO2 and pellets, so stock up!

I’ll keep on writing. I’m glad that you find the reviews helpful!
AirHead

Comment on Crosman NightStalker Tactical with Red / Green Dot Scope, Tactical Flashlight, and Bi-Pod by fsdanlie

fsdanlie — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:43:14 +0000

Read your review ,Guess what,went out and bought one and i seated my pellets like you said and no jams.Pulverized an orange at 14 yards.I got lucky there is 4 rotary clips in the box.Shot close to 200 rounds.On my way to walmart to get some more c02′s.Bought my stalker at Academy.Thank you very much for your reviews. Dano.

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:36:31 +0000

Thank you for your comments. We are supposed to have some more TechForce products coming our way soon to review. I just got some Benjamin pellets when I was at the Virginia Airgun Expo. It may be a good time for a follow up review!

AirHead.

Comment on Compasseco’s TechForce® Contender 89 Break Barrel Rifle, .22 Caliber and 3x12x40 AO Scope. by fsdanlie

fsdanlie — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:08:07 +0000

Have one it’s 8 months old and it is my favorite shooter.It hits extremely hard.Did use the crosman hallow points,it does alot of damage on mt dove i shoot.I use benjamin diablo pellets 14.3 grain now.Have 4 thousand rounds on mine it easier to cock but it still has authority on targets.Dont have a crony,i know it has power.Use a leapers 3/9/40 mil dot with red and green.

Comment on Daisy Powerline 1000sb Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x32 Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:10:37 +0000

Nexweb,

I’ve seen the B26 out there for anywhere between $130 and $189. I just use $180 as a “worst case” scenario. I’m glad that you like the B26. Dollar for Dollar I believe it to be the best rifle on the market right now.. but that is just my opinion.

AirHead

Comment on Daisy Powerline 1000sb Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x32 Scope by Nexweb

Nexweb — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:00:11 +0000

About the BAM B26 I bought it, and still see it on a couple sites selling for $140 shipped without a scope. I love mine and actually enjoy shooting it just with the open sites. Could the $180 price be from the B26-2 which is the muzzle-brake/thumb-hole stock?

Comment on Xisico Air Guns – General Review by tdljazz

tdljazz — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:41:50 +0000

Be careful Mike, some of us know you! lol
btw Rick. Good article. Will be reading more.

Comment on Xisico Air Guns – General Review by Mike Dill

Mike Dill — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:45:32 +0000

Hey! I heard that. I could show you just how energetic this “OLD TIMER” can get. Mike Dill

Comment on Xisico Air Guns – General Review by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:30:36 +0000

Dear jwburns,

First of all.. please forgive the delay. I've been really swamped, and I want to say THANK YOU for your kind words regarding my review. I'm really trying to bring accurate and fair reviews to folks just like you!

It seems like you and my friend Mike should talk. He is an "old timer" as well and just got in to airguns. (he got me hooked!) His first rifle was the Crosman G1 Extreme and he loves everything about it but the weight and the fact that it does not have open sights.

I don't have too much info for you about where Crosman guns are made. I do believe that BAM and Crosman are at different plants, but I could be wrong so don't quote me on it!

In general the Crosman rifles ARE underrated. In general their stuff is pretty good and Crosman stands behind their products. Which is a good think because about 1/2 of what I've reviewed had to go back and get fixed, but for the price, they are hard to beat.

When it comes to the BAM guns. You'll pay a little more than you would for a Crosman, but not anywhere near what you'll pay for an RWS. The BAM line of rifles, starting with the B26 and working up from there, are really excellent guns. My favorite is the B26. I don't think there is a better gun out there for the money. Open sights are my preference (did not used to be), and my friend Mike can hold a nickel sized group with a bench rest at 20 yards with his .177 and open sights.

I hope that you'll continue to visit the site and lend your comments. I've got a new review coming out this weekend or early next week, the B50 PCP from BAM. If you really want to spend about a month (or more) reading some really good reviews, visit www.pyramid.com/blog. That is where I got my feet wet.

Thanks again for your comments and we hope to see ya back here soon!

AirHead

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:10:49 +0000

Dear Nexweb,

First of all.. please forgive the delay! I’m glad that you like your B26 so far. Just dab a bit of the rem oil on a patch and run it through to coat the barrel and you’ll be fine.

The combustion port is the little hole that lines up with the barrel when it is shut. It is where the air comes out when the piston is released. Try to NOT get any oil in there.

The rest of it should be pretty safe. Please let us know how you do with it!

AirHead

Comment on Xisico Air Guns – General Review by jwburns

jwburns — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:02:02 +0000

Ok, I have been in Professional Tech Sales for years and know a professional evaluation when I see one. Yours is great. I am new to air gunning, am a old timer, but the bug has bit me big time. I have done more research in the past month than I think 50% o the population has done in 1 decade. I really want to learn about air guns. It all started with the crosman storm in a walmart store. My first air gun at the age of 55. I shot this weapon for about 3 weeks, and then bought a RWS mdl.34. OK, RWS, speaks for itself in quality. But I want to learn from the ground up. Tell me, please about Crosman. Where in China is it made? How is the Quality? Is the factory that make crosman related to BAM? The gun compares to the
RWS in my opinion in spring power, maybe not as strong but close. For $99.00 any kid or at least any kid when I was 15 would have loved this gun. For some reason I think Crosman is really under rated. I love my RWS 34, will keep this quality gun in my rack for my son and shoot it, will start a new collection of fine air rifles from the ground floor up. I am intrigued by the Crosman product. Where can I get a real evaluation of this company?
Thanks so much
and keep up the great work.

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by Nexweb

Nexweb — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:55:29 +0000

I’ve been playing around with my .22 B26 and I love it so far. The open sights are accurate and I just received mounts for my scope today. I cleaned the barrel till the patches came out clean, and you said to run some gun oil in there, but what kind? I have some rem oil will that do? Also, where exactly is the combustion port. Are there any other places I should oil to keep it running smooth? Keep up the good work and thanks for the help!

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:38:09 +0000

Hello Nexweb,

You will definaty want to clean the barrel. Use a brass brush and some solvent. If you can, get some J-B Bore Paste from Pyramid Air and a single piece rod. Actually Wal-mart sells a single piece, coated, .177 cleaning rod for about $4.00. Pick up a few brass brushes (make sure the thread s match) and you’ll be all set. If you really want it clean, pick up a .177 bore snake too. It is much easier than running patches through it for 30 minutes.

You should only need to clean the barrel once. Use the solvent or the bore paste on the brush and run it back and forth about 20 times. After about 10 strokes it should lighten up. Now put some gun oil on your snake and run it through a couple of times. You’ll have a shinny new barrel.

Make sure to NEVER put oil in the combustion port or you will ruin your rifle. Never dry fire the rifle, and never leave it cocked for long periods of time. If you cock it, make sure to insert a pellet and discharge it in a safe direction.

Please let us know how you like the B26. I’ll have a new review of it in .177 coming soon.

Hope to hear from you soon.

AirHead.

(if you ordered the .22, just substitute everything I said in .22 )

Comment on Xisico (BAM) B26 .22 Break Barrel Rifle with 3x9x40 AO Scope by Nexweb

Nexweb — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:15 +0000

Thanks for the review! I’m receiving my B26 on monday and I already have a centerpoint 3-9X40 AO scope so the setup should be pretty similar to what you reviewed. Should I clean the barrel and lube the gun when I get it? I’m new to break-barrels, I only have a crosman 760 so I’m trying to find out as much as I can before I receive my B26. Thanks!

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by n9emz

n9emz — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:40:07 +0000

Rick

Thanks for the trigger info….my #2 complaint about the G1. My #1 complaint is scope placement. I had to remove the rail stop and back the scope up another 2″ for comfort. My fault there….I was born without a neck.

My take on the G1′s range. I initially sighted in at 35 yds and was happy with 6″ groups relative to all the “fliers” I put downrange before establishing some semblance of trigger control. After another 50 rounds at 50 yds I’m doing 50% in 6″ shooting offhand.

Note this is my first break-barrel rifle and that I’m using Premier hunting hollow points. I’ve got an assortment of Diablos (for my Umarex B92FS) I’m going to try next weekend as well as pick up the ones you recommended from the G1 review.

After just 100 or so rounds, I’m pleased with the G1. I bought it because the local feral dog packs have begun to ignore my pistol. Not so with the G1 and it’s an all-new ballgame. I did a rear hip takedown on one critter at 30 yds and made another one jump my fence at 70 yds. If the G1 doesn’t make them put my property on their avoidance list, the .243 Winchester and shovel come out of their racks.

As I said, I’m pleased, but I’d have picked up the Gamo Big Cat 1200 if it had been in stock. My nephew’s BC12 shoots a bit sweeter than the G1.

Thanks and regards,

Sam

Comment on What gun should I buy!!! by deputylynch

deputylynch — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:44:57 +0000

It looks like I’m going to buy a B26 in .177 and hope it is much better than the G1!

Which pellets do you think I should try?

Do you have any experience with the ones that Xisico makes:
http://www.xisicousa.com/pellets.html

What about the Crosman Heavy domed at 10.5gr:
http://www.pyramydair.com/cgi-bin/pellet.pl?pellet_id=154

What about these rings:
http://www.pyramydair.com/cgi-bin/accessory.pl?accessory_id=359
will they work and allow me to still use the open sights??

One more thing I found a posting on some sight asking if a .22 would be more accurate and easier to shoot in a springer over a .177; any thoughts?

Like I stated I think the .177 will kill my occasional groundhog and be more economical in the long run!

Oh, I’m probably going to buy a KL-3B for $30 for the kids to use and was wondering if you are familiar with them at all?

Thanks again for all of your help,
Dave

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:50:33 +0000

Dear Deputy Lynch

I thought your post might have been abbreviated… and I’m glad that you’ve kept writing. This kind of exchange is helpful to our readers.

1″ in .177 at 20 yards is a very attainable goal. There are several rifles out there that can do this. I would recommend that you check B.B.’s Blog over at PyramidAir. ( http://www.pyramidair.com/blog ) He did a series of articles on “The best rifles under $100, $200, $300, etc.” He has a lot more experience with different guns than I do.

You may want to call the folks over at http://www.airgundepot.com or http://www.compasseco.com and talk to them directly. Both suppliers have been very helpful to me. From what I’ve been told, and it will be one of our next reviews, the TechForce 99 Magnum ($135 on sale from $169 at http://www.compasseco.com right now) gives you under lever cocking, fixed barrel accuracy, and delivers 1100 FPS in .177 (expect 900 to 1000 fps depending on pellet, 900 fps is what you are looking for and if you can get it with a heavy pellet, that will work best.)

In general, hunting with a .177 means you have to be an excellent shot or you will mostly just wound your game even if you use hollow point pellets, expecially something at big as a ground hog. Consider rather a hard hitting .22. In the long run I think you’ll be happier with it, but that is just my opinion. There are many excellet choices in .22 pellets, the RWS line is a good example.

I’m not sure about the Mendoza RM-2003. I have the RM-200 and it is one of the nicest rifles under $100. I’ve read conflicting on their other products so I’m not sure what to tell you.

Regarding “how hard are things things to shoot,” how have you done with the G1? Have you been able to get the groups you are looking for? I recently took a trip to see family and visited my nephew to which I gave a Crosman Sierra pro rifle. He was complaining that he could not get the scope adjusted, so I took a day and we all went shooting in their back field. After a while I was shooting sub 1″ groups at 25 yards with his gun. He could bairly keep 4″ groups at that distance. When I gave him the Contender 89 or the BAM B40 he shot 1″ groups with ease. The difference, weight of the guns, craftsmanship, and experience.

My brother in law, who is an excellent shot come to find out, took my Beeman GH950 a and dropped a red squirrel out of a tree 30 yards away while shooting from a standing position on his 2nd floor landing. He also took my rifles, and from a standing position, shot a 20oz water bottle at 65 yards when I couldn’t hit it. He has a lot of practice shooting in the woods without the benefit of a nice shooting table and rest so he just puts me to shame.

The bottom line, My nephew was able to shoot a quality gun from a rest accurately. My brother in law was able to shot a quality gun from any position. The common factor wast that they were both shooting quality guns. As much as I appreciate Crosman for providing low cost adult air rifles, if you get a good one, they still take a lot of skill to shoot accurately. When I shot the Crosman Sierra Pro and got the groups down to 1″, it took a lot of concentration and effort, something that you may not have time to do when the little critters are tearing up your yard and you want to dispatch them.

You mentioned Glock and AR… if you are a firearm guy you know there is a big difference between Hi-Point and Glock. They both may shoot 9mm, but one you could trust with your life and the other you may go and plink with but if given the choice would never grab it in a pinch when the other was available.

In the air gun hobby world $200 is really not a lot of money, but it is hard for folks new to the sport to justify spending $200, $300, $400, or more on a pellet rifle when a firearm in may cases costs less. I had the same problem when I started. But once you shoot a real quality air gun and realize that you don’t have to go to a range every time you want some trigger time, you’ll gain the appreciation for the sport and the guns.

I don’t know if I’ve helped or just confused you more, but I hope that this exchange has been helpful and useful for you.

Best of luck.

AirHead

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by deputylynch

deputylynch — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:48:06 +0000

For some reason my post was cut short!

I have a total of $134 in the G1 and it would be $200 for the B26 with their 3 x 9 scope and 1 piece mount; $220 for the B26-1 with the same set up!

Would this set up be worth the extra $65 - $85??

http://bestairgun.stores.yahoo.net/bamxsairrico3.html

Also, I would prefer to go with the .177 over the .22 since it is easier and there is greater availability of the .177 pellets?

I would like a gun that would group under 1 inch at 20 yrds.

What do you think about a Mendoza RM-2003 for under $150 which would give me both calibers?

I realize that $220 is not a lot for this hobby but I would rather spend anymore than that on another Glock or AR-15!

One more thing; how hard are these things to shot since they all seem much more critical than even a cheap .22 lr?

Thanks again for your assistance and could you email me directly if all of this post doesn't list?

Deputy Lynch

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:58:50 +0000

Dear Deputy Lynch,

40 yards is a bit of a stretch for any air gun to take a groundhog, but if that is your goal, you may want to take a look at the most recent review that I just posted to the site on the The TechForce® Contender 89 from Compasseco. I know that it is way out of your $150 price range, but it will give you the accuracy at 40+ yards so that head shots yielding one shot kills should not be a problem.

For now you may want to just stick with the G1 unless it does not give you the results you are looking for. For some added damage on your game, you may want to try the Gamo Pro Magnum pellets. I’m not sure how they will group in the G1 but they are heavy and should be more accurate at longer ranges.

Please let us know how things work out for you.

AirHead

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by deputylynch

deputylynch — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:56:55 +0000

I’m looking to kill the Groundhogs in my back yard at a range of about 15 – 40 yrds!

I have done it with my High Standard .22 Pistol but am afraid the neighbors might start to say somehthing!

But now I’m thinking of getting into the air rifle thing and want something that will out shoot me!
I would like something to group

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:38:46 +0000

Dear Deputy Lynch,

If $150 is your max budget, then stick with the G1 if it is shooting well. It looks like many vendors have raised the price on the B26. Do you have a preference in caliber? What type of shooting are you looking to do? I may know of something that work work better for you.

AirHead

FYI, PyramidAir.com has a very large selection of scopes. Take a look at the Leapers line. They are priced right, and work great.

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by deputylynch

deputylynch — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:22:26 +0000

What is the cheapest scope and mount you would put on a B26 since I just bought the G1 and could take it back!

I would like to have a rifle that would shoot very well at 20 yards with a variable scope for around $150 so that is why I thougt the G1 was a very good value especially over the first Storm 1000 that I had bought and had to return!

I would be willing to go a little higher in price but would expect a great improvement over the $125 rifle I have in the G1!

Thanks again,
Deputy Lynch

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:06:37 +0000

Dear Deputy Lynch,

To tell you the truth the B26 is in a different class to the G1. The G1 took a lot of work to get .5″ groups at 20 yards. The B26 did it right out of the box, nearly with open sights. It is far less hold sensitive and has an exceptional trigger. You may pay a bit more for a B26 Combo, but you’ll have one heck of a setup when you are done.

Please don’t get me wrong, the G1 with scope is a heck of a combo and I recommend it as an entry level rifle.

Thanks again for your comments.

AirHead

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:48:47 +0000

Dear Deputy Lynch,

From what I’ve seen when buying from Wal-mart you never know who else has been in the box or what that box has been through to get to the store. Several times I’ve been by boxes half opened or taped up.

As for pellets, I’ve found the Crosman Field points to work well as well as the Crosman Premier Hollow Points and You can get the bi-pod at PyramidAir.com.

I’m guessing that you’ve read the GRT-III trigger post. As you can see if you’ve got the G1, the GRT-III trigger is a very worth while upgrade.

I hope you enjoy the G1. I sure enjoyed mine when I had it around.

Hope you like the rest of the site.

AirHead

Comment on GRT III – Drop-In Replacement Trigger by deputylynch

deputylynch — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:59:52 +0000

Isn’t the G1 a better value than the BAM-B26 after you consider the scope and mount you get with it for around $125 over the $140 for the BAM, and after the trigger for $32 your still only $17 more for the G1!

Don’t you think the scope and mounts are worth more than that!

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by deputylynch

deputylynch — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:37:57 +0000

How does buying a G1 from someplace other that WalMart make a difference since it would seem to me that they ship the same guns out to different distributors???

I have just bought one at Wally World that seems to be fine but I’ll have to keep shooting it to find out.

What pellets have you found to be the most accurate out of the G1 and have you had a chance to put the GRT III trigger in it yet?

You mention the Dragon Claw Bi-Pod for $20; where can it be had for that price?

Thanks for your assistance!

Deputy Lynch

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by Rabbitt

Rabbitt — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:51:02 +0000

Well the wife came through for my birthday and got me the 2300S. Sweet pistol. Spent a little bit of time with it yesterday and enjoyed shooting it.

Really a PITA to load wadcutters though. I thought I had remembered something on BB’s blog about the problem being fixed but is not easy to load on mine. Tried some round nose and they weren’t much better. How were the ones you used?

All in all I like the trigger once I had it dialed down to minimum pull. The C02 seemed to give consistent power until the very end. I didn’t notice it running out until it wouldn’t shoot a pellet and there was just a hint of gas left in it when I removed the powerlet.

I also noticed on the instruction sheet that Crosman recommends using Pellgun oil on every powerlet! Sure hadn’t seen that on my other Crosman pistols.

I think I’m going to like shooting this gun. I’m not very accurate but that’s me and not the gun itself. Still trying to learn to use a two hand and also one hand grip. My “bench” is the top of the backrest of a bar stool so you know that’s accurate.

Keep the reviews coming and shhot safe.

Rabbitt

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:59:41 +0000

Dear MadCityMike,

Thank you for your post. I’m going to send it directly to Crosman for their Quality Control folks to review. If you look back through my postings I had very similar encounters with my first Crosman G1′s that I bought at Wal-mart. One was terribly inaccurate and the other had a broken stock out of the box. I also had problems with their Remington Genesis and a loosening barrel causing the barrel to droop and move left to right.

YOU ARE NOT IMAGINING THINGS! I was almost turned off ALL break barrel rifles until I purchased a Gammo 440 Hunter and found that not all rifles are created equal.. event though they may look the same. There is an inherent problem with rifles from China… (Gamo is from Spain) total inconsistency in one from another. The only positive way to get your Crosman to shoot like it can (see above) is to send it back to Crosman for their quality control folks to deal with it. I know that it is a pain but they will defiantly take care of you and make sure that what you get back works as promised. I hope that if more people get on their case it will cause them to require more from the manufacture in the way of quality control measures so that guys like you and me don’t have to keep sending them duds in the mail.

Now back to the “break barrel” issue. I’ve shot several excellent break barrel rifles that don’t show ANY signs of loosing accuracy because of the joint loosening up. The Beeman GH950, Gamo 440, BAM B26, and TechForce 89 Contender are just a few examples. Obviously you will get better results from a fixed barrel rifle. A good entry level example is the Gamo CFX (now available in .22 in the USA). As you move up to the fixed barrel guns, your price moves up as well. I believe the CFX starts at about $200.

To wrap this up.. I sympathize with you. I hate buying something, getting it home, just to have my expectations drop to the floor. Shooting should be a fun experience and not a frustrating one. If you want that G1 to work for you, contact Crosman support at 1.800.7AIRGUN and let them know about the problems you’ve had. They will take care of it for you.

Hope this helps.

AirHead

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by MadCityMike

MadCityMike — Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:15:19 +0000

I just bought this gun at Gander Mountain for under $100 and have not had any luck with it. This is my first break barrel so maybe someone can tell me if I’m doing something wrong. I have a 25′ range in my basement and I can get 1/4″ groups with my plastic toy Daisy 880 and 1/2″ groups with my 1077 co2. I qualify as an expert for Army weapon qualification so I don’t think it’s that I can’t shoot, but I can’t get any shots with this thing to be within 6 inches of each other at 25′. WTF? I’ve tried the open palm right in front of the trigger. I’ve tried sandbagging, and it’s absolutely the worst thing I’ve ever seen. I tighted the screws like someone mentioned here. I noticed that once I close the breach that any movement of the gun will essentially cause the barrel to drop down. So I took it back thinking the locking mechanism was broke. The guys there opened 3 brand new packages and they all did the same thing. Just look at the thing wrong and the barrel drops. Is that normal for a break barrel? The guy opened up some $250 gamo and the barrel was definately stiffer, but a slight nudge under the hinge caused that barrel to drop as well. How in the world can anyone actually get any sort of accuracy at all with one of these things when the scope is mounted separate from a barrel that flops all over the place? The gunsmith there knew of another G1 that had just been returned due to a DOA scope so we looked at that one and the barrel was definately stiffer. You could aim the gun and the barrel wouldn’t noticeably drop. So he exchanged mine for that one, and I kept the original scope. (By the way, I’ve tried a different scope that I’m positive works fine and I get the same results so I don’t think it can be the scope.) After a few shots back at home it was just as loose as the original and the others at the store. Could it really be possible to have 5 out of 5 bad guns? Is it just normal to have movement in the barrel? I don’t know how anyone could claim any sort of accuracy like above if so, so I can’t believe that the gun is supposed to do this. Is there a way to tighten up the lock? Why am I having so much trouble. Please help, the sparrows at starting to overrun us here! Oh, one final thing. I’ve tried Crossman hollow points, hunting points, and some Daisy wadcutters. They’re all equally inaccurate.

Mike

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:46:03 +0000

Dear DearSlayer,

Thank you for your question. Let’s see if I can help you out. I found the best pellet was the crosman field point (as mentioned in my post). My friend whit the same rifle shoots the crosman premier hollow points with great success. But before we talk pellets let me ask a few questions.
1. did you tighten up all the screws?
2. did you clean the barrel throughly?
3. did you check all the scope screws?

If you’d done all that, then you can move on to finding the right pellet for your gun. Also, how are you holding the rifle? As I mentioned in my post, I found the bi-pod the best for bench shooting. If you are shooting of the shoulder, then make sure to just cradle the forearm of the stock, just in front of the trigger, (find the balance point of the gun) and make sure to pull the trigger evenly. If your’s is anything like mine, the trigger was my biggest complaint. I’ve got an upcoming review of a drop in trigger replacement that makes it a dream to shoot. That will be coming in about 3 weeks.

Hope some of that helps. Please let us know.

AirHead

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by thedeerslayer

thedeerslayer — Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:39:09 +0000

Rick

I just bought my G1 2 days ago.I am impressed with the power,but am all over the target.Shooting crossman pointed premium grade pellets,4.5mm.
I have only shot about 25 pellets through it.Do you thing it just needs more break in or try differant brand and weight ammo or both?

Thanks

Comment on A quick note about Safety. by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:22:00 +0000

Hi Rick
THANK YOU for the Very informative post . Glad you and no one else wasn’t hurt and that there where no damages .

Just makes you think how fast and easy things can go wrong even though you think you are doing everything right .

Something as simple and easy and what seemed right ( Checking Your Safty )

Take care …….JerryL99

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:02:39 +0000

Dear Mike,

I would agree that with this Rifle, the .22 is less of a necessity. When you can drop a pellet on a quarter at 30+ yards, it becomes more about shot placement than shock value of the pellet. But what if you could use a .22 and drop it on a quarter at 30+ yards…. Keep reading the reviews. We may have something special coming up!

AirHead

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by Mike Dill

Mike Dill — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:55:10 +0000

Nice job Ricky. I like my G1 too. a real power house. I have MANY 80 foot one shot kills. also it usually produces a lot of blood. Must have a lot of shock power. Forget the 22′s why would I need anything else? Mike Dill

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by Rabbitt

Rabbitt — Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:01:10 +0000

Thanks for the extra pics and description on loading the C02. That cleared up my nagging little question.

Rabbitt

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:10:59 +0000

JerryL,

Nice to hear from you again! We are trying to get better with our reviews. Like with anything, practice makes perfect. I believe that Crosman makes a version called the Tac 1 Extreme. It comes with a bunch of accessories that raise the price to about $254. If you are looking for an inexpensive, hard hitting .22, keep your eyes on the site for our upcoming review of the Crosman 800x. Our initial rifle had some issues so we are getting a replacement from Crosman. The guys over at http://www.airgundepot.com provided the rifle for review and at only $119, Scope Included!, may be just what you are looking for.

Also, just a note, we have received the full line of BAM rifles for review, including their PCP in .22. Keep your eye on the site as I’ll be getting these out over the next few weeks.

Thanks again!

AirHead

Comment on Crosman G1 Extreme Rifle Kit w/ 3x9x32 AO Scope by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:52:15 +0000

Hi Rick

Those where some really great posts recently . That Crossman G1 sounds like a great entry / cheepie gun. . Do you know if it comes in .22 ?
JerryL

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:47:23 +0000

Rabbitt,

I did not try the Gamo Match pellets. I was getting such good groups with those inexpensive Crosman Wadcutters, that I did not look far beyond them. I’ve requested some Gamo Match pellets for one of my upcoming reviews. If I’ve still got the 2300s around I’ll run some through it and let you know.

I hope to post my review of the Crosman G1 Extreme tonight. I’m getting groups just slightly larger than 1/4″ c to c at 20 yards. Should be a good review.

Shoot Safe!

AirHead

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by Rabbitt

Rabbitt — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:24:52 +0000

I also meant to ask about your pellet testing. Did you try the Gamo Match pellets and if so how did they do vs the Crosman wadcutters? I have found them to be good for all of my pistols so far and the price is good. But then I am shooting in a basement at about 25ft. so I don’t know how they may be at longer distances.

Thanks.

Rabbitt

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:12:21 +0000

Dear Rabbitt,

Thanks for your comments. I knew I forgot something. I’m planning on taking some new photos so when I do I’ll take some of the CO2 port. BTW, the chamber under the barrel is where the CO2 goes.

Thanks again!

AirHead

Comment on Crosman 2300s co2 10 meter .177 Target Pistol by Rabbitt

Rabbitt — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:03:55 +0000

Nice review. I really like the number of different pics you posted. I especially
like you showing how to adjust the trigger. But, where does one load the CO2
powerlet?

I’ve been lusting after the 2300S since I saw BB’s review.

Birthdays coming up so maybe the wife will take the hint.

I have been enjoying all of your reviews, found you by way of BB’s Blog on
Pyramydair. Keep up the great work.

Rabbitt

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Part 2 by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Mon, 14 May 2007 04:50:39 +0000

Thanks for the info I am really thinking about getting this one maybe. I have a benjamin 392 but I want a .22cal springer. I have a winchester 800x .177 cal springer right now. Thanks again for your time and money

Comment on Crossman 1077 Final Look….. maybe by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Mon, 14 May 2007 04:48:29 +0000

Great Review as I stated before I have a 1077 with the black syntheic stock. I is not much fun past 10 yards. And after about 60 shots or maybe even less You start to have pellets bounce off of pop cans and cardboard. It is not a hunting rifle at all unless I guess it was a small bird or rat or mouse and very close range probaly like 5-10 yards max.

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Fri, 11 May 2007 17:47:34 +0000

Kenny, (and others)

I’m going to be posting a full review on the matter, but to just give you a taste here is some info:

I updated my Mendoza RM200 with a 3x9x40 AO scope, and added the Dragon Claw Bi-Pod from Pyramid Air. I’m now shooting consistent 1/2 groups at 20 yards. I’ve switched to the RWS Superdome pellet for one reason… Availability. I went back to Pyramid to get more Logun pellets and they were out. When I first tried the Superdome I was not impressed, I guess that I need to just shoot more than one or two because I’m VERY happy with them now. I’ve got a few more pellets to try before I finish my report.

RWS Superdome velocity was as follows:

(At the muzzle)
High: 561
Low: 529
Average: 540
Difference: 32

With a rifle rated for 600 FPS, to get a 540 average is pretty good in my book, cause these are not light pellets.

More to come… (with photos!!!)

AirHead

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by kenny

kenny — Fri, 11 May 2007 17:24:37 +0000

Airhead:
Looks like BBs testing this one at the same time. Its going to be good to have two good tests to look at. There has yet to be a good test on the web to compair the different Mendoza rifels. I will stay tuned in for the info.

Comment on Crosman 1077 C02 12 Shot Repeater by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Wed, 09 May 2007 17:12:09 +0000

Sorry I don’t have a device to measure. I use crosman copperheads cause they are cheap in price but group quite well. I would guess 400-500 is about right. If I shoot at anything besides card board and cans they richoet pretty bad. But with my winchester 800x and Benjmain 392 .22cal I dont have this problem at all

Comment on Crosman 1077 C02 12 Shot Repeater by AirHead

AirHead — Wed, 09 May 2007 14:10:26 +0000

pbelkin,

I figured I’d get the adaptor too at some point. It will make for a good “part 3″ of the review. Do you have the means to test what kind of FPS you are getting from yours? My initial tests were a bit disappointing barely managing 400 FPS. I did not have a lot of time to try different pellets as it started to rain so I’ll have to get back to it once the weather clears up. One thing for sure is that it is VERY fun to shoot and VERY accurate for an inexpensive air rifle.

AirHead

Comment on Crosman 1077 C02 12 Shot Repeater by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Wed, 09 May 2007 13:48:44 +0000

I have owned the 1077 since last summer. I have the black synthetic stock. It is a hoot to shoot. I get about 60 rounds or so out of a reg sized co2 cartridge. That is accurate rounds since the power drops off after about 50 shots or so. I want to add one of those power sources so I can have longer shooting sessions.

Thanks again for this great website. Keep up the great reviews. I enjoy them every time I read them. And now after see the version with the walnut stock I want one of those too lol.

pbelkin

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Tue, 08 May 2007 17:33:17 +0000

Kenny,

The bench testing is going well. I’ve got some more tests to do before I confirm how this other pellet is doing. I’ll let everyone know just as soon as I’ve completed everything. I also just got my Chronograph in so I’ll have hard numbers for that as well.

Stay Tuned!

Airhead

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by kenny

kenny — Tue, 08 May 2007 17:21:37 +0000

Hows the bench testing going? And did you find a better pellet than the loguns. I’m shooting the 2003 and am looking to close the groups down from my JBS Predators. Although they have been doing just fine on the bird and squirrel population in the back yard.

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by AirHead

AirHead — Sun, 06 May 2007 17:05:27 +0000

pbelkin780,

Thanks for posting your comment. Make sure that you read the fine print on the “multi-shot” aspect of the rifle. I believe that you have to use Mendoza’s solid base pellets for that feature to work.
(Pulled from pyramidair.com’s description)
“Pre-load the onboard magazine with seven, Mendoza solid base pellets, cock the barrel and youâ€™ll get another shot without having to individually load each pellet. Or, single-load the breech with your favorite .22 caliber pellet for field hunting or casual plinking fun”

I was looking at the same rifle for the same reason, but could not find the pelets anywhere. Please let us know if you get one and what you think of it!

AirHead.

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Sun, 06 May 2007 04:48:54 +0000

Thanks for the info. I will keep that in mind better to wait for delivery than to go home with a gun that does not work

Comment on Mendoza RM200 Review by pbelkin780

pbelkin780 — Sun, 06 May 2007 04:47:35 +0000

Just wanted to say thanks. I have been thinking about getting this Air Rifle. I couldn’t decide though if I wanted this or the RM2000 being that it is a little more powerful and is multi-shot

Comment on Buying Airguns at Wal-mart… good idea? by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:01:23 +0000

Hi Rick and Viewers

I am also GUILTY of buying a gun at WALLY WORLD or Wal-Mart. They might get and carry some Name brand and some good items at a good price . But chances are they are second class or low class bottom of the line .
I have come to the fact that if and when I want something such as a fire arm of ANY TYPE and or upper end Sporting Goods or Tools for that matter I will go to a qualified supplier or name brand dealer.
If I need support the name brand dealer is either qualified as a repair station or can well advise me and or will stand behind their products .
These are just my personal feelings .
Take care have fun shoot safe ….JerryL

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by AirHead

AirHead — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:26:10 +0000

Jerry,

I’ve had mixed results with using “rests.” The groups you see in this article were shot using a rolled up doggie bed of all things. I’ve found that I use the rest, whatever it is, to steady my hand and still use my hand at the best ballance point of the rifle.

So far that has been working for me.

Thanks for your comments!

Rick

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:31:08 +0000

Sand Bag and or Bi-Pod resting a springer and resulting accuracy.

I have read in many forums and articles that you should NOT Sand Bag or Bi -Pod rest a Springer, under the barrel and even the fore arm of the stock .

I know some shooters have done and do this .
I have made some tests of my own because I am NOT as steady as I once was.
What I have tried and tested are the following .

I have taken a couple of empty shot shell bags and tried filling them with an assortment of fillers . ( Kitty Litter / Walnut Tumbling Media / Styrofoam packing material ( pop corn ) / Cotton or the fiber pillow stuffing . )
I then topped the bag off with a thin piece of leather that was from an old soft leather jacket and laid it over the bag before resting the rifle on it BY THE FORE ARM OF THE STOCK ONLY , AT THE SAME PLACE EVERY TIME .
The best results are from the Kitty Litter and the Styrofoam Packing )
The next thing I tried was to use an old ( Short camera tripod ( Table model ) and made a cradle that screws on to the threaded camera hold screw , and then lined it with soft material topped with that same old piece of leather that I mentioned above . Again resting the rifle only by the fore arm of the stock .

I have gotten good accuracy from using these methods.
Now don’t get me wrong the gun does and will shoot differently than if it was sighted in being hand held . You just have to know and or compensate for resting it or if that is the way you will be shooting sight it in for that .

Hope this might help someone .
Take care have fun shoot safe ….. JerryL

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:37:32 +0000

Some other points on Accuracy

I would like to post my findings as to picking up your gun and firing the first shot of the day .. It doesn’t matter what gun or weather it’s loaded ammo or black poder or pumped air or CO2 or a Springer .
I have found that most times the first shot will go to a certain POI ( Point of Impact )or POA ( Point of AIM ) The second and following shots will go to another POI. As the gun slightly warms from firing ,the POI may or may not slightly drift to a given location . This might be only fractions of an inch to maybe 1 1/2 inches .
I also have found that weather the gun is warmed up or shot several rounds , that if you change brand and type of Amo your POI will also change a bit . Then when changing back to say what the gun is sighted in with it will take about 2 – 4 rounds to get it to shoot back at the POI / POA that was original set .

When I was working and before I retired I was with Cleveland Police Swat Unit …The guys that where the marksmen / snipers would have their weapons zeroed in for whatever season it was . ( according to outside temps )
They kept a scratch sheet with their rife as to where the sights should be set from a cold first shot ( according to season and weather ) to different ranges / up hill – down hill and the temp ranges . Also with the different brands of amo ( they usually didn’t don’t change )
But there is a difference from a COLD FIST SHOT to a second quick shot.

I guess how this all fits into this forum is that if your taking your first shot of the day and your target is small and far out . That if you need a second or 3rd shot or if for some reason you change amo your shots could be off. Will take some doing but you can know where those 2nd and following shots will go . might be easier to know what the first shot will do and compensate for it . Then the remaining shots with in a few minutes will all be in your POI or POA ( point of Aim )

Hope this wasn’t all boring and useless and that it makes some sense or helps someone .

JerryL99

Comment on Accuracy means different things to different people! by JerryL99

JerryL99 — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:33:57 +0000

I am NOT the shot I once was due to age / eyes / certain health problems and the Meds I am on .
I have noticed some small quirks in my shooting .
I find that I can hit just any old plinking target at any given range with any type gun or caliber better than if I am aiming at a bullseye type target .

What I am saying is ,if I am out in the field or woods or shooting out in my back yard and the paper bullseye shooting gets boring I start to pick out targets such as a very thin dead snag on a tree or a lone leaf or small mound of mud or bark on the ground a puff ball out on the lawn , it doesn’t matter what or at what range .

I just find that I can shoot and hit better at a random target .
It almost seems that when I look at a Bullseye weather the rings type / square / or even a picture of a critter I don’t hit as well . I have even tried different color schemes of rings / squares.

As I think about this , I have come to realize that I have done this all my life .

Don’t know why it is or what this is called if there is a name for it ( Other than FUN )

This happen with anyone else ?
JerryL99